Skip to content

fix(audio): preserve recording outcomes during cancellation and cleanup - #2482

Merged
HAYDEN-OAI merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
codex/audio-recording-cancellation-cleanup-20260826-1731-ipqqqb
Aug 26, 2026
Merged

HAYDEN-OAI merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
codex/audio-recording-cancellation-cleanup-20260826-1731-ipqqqb

Conversation

@HAYDEN-OAI

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

  • Preserve the first recording result when caller/timeout abort listeners, output-stream cleanup, logging sinks, or subprocess cancellation callbacks throw or reenter.
  • Reliably observe caller and timeout cancellation during listener registration while preserving listener ownership, intentional-stop semantics, and captured-audio privacy.
  • Add 37 regression tests through the documented openai/helpers/audio public entrypoint, including independent cleanup failures, late private output, cross-signal races, and native subprocess failure modes.

Validation

  • Node.js 22.23.0 and 26.7.0: 6,566 handwritten tests plus 556 generated tests pass on each runtime.
  • Canonical lint, strict TypeScript, production build, published-source TypeScript 4.9 and 6, and package lint.
  • Packed CommonJS/ESM package validation on both runtimes, including actual public audio-helper cancellation regressions.

@HAYDEN-OAI
HAYDEN-OAI requested a review from a team as a code owner August 26, 2026 17:35
@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Aug 26, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-08-26T20:35:23.541020Z ac64d09 New commits
🔒 Security Review ✅ Completed 2026-08-26T20:35:52.738857Z ac64d09 New commits
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@openai-sdks

openai-sdks Bot commented Aug 26, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

OkTest Summary

✅ 237/237 SDK tests passed in 10.926s for Node SDK PR #2482.

Test results — 42 files
Test Result Time
tests/chat-completions-complex-body.test.ts ✅ Passed 154ms
tests/chat-completions-create.test.ts ✅ Passed 243ms
tests/chat-completions-stream.test.ts ✅ Passed 243ms
tests/files-content-binary.test.ts ✅ Passed 178ms
tests/files-create-multipart.test.ts ✅ Passed 196ms
tests/files-list-pagination.test.ts ✅ Passed 188ms
tests/initialize-config.test.ts ✅ Passed 208ms
tests/instance-isolation.test.ts ✅ Passed 181ms
tests/models-list.test.ts ✅ Passed 182ms
tests/responses-background-lifecycle.test.ts ✅ Passed 214ms
tests/responses-body-method-errors.test.ts ✅ Passed 338ms
tests/responses-cancel-timeout.test.ts ✅ Passed 231ms
tests/responses-cancel.test.ts ✅ Passed 195ms
tests/responses-compact-retries.test.ts ✅ Passed 275ms
tests/responses-compact.test.ts ✅ Passed 241ms
tests/responses-create-advanced-stream.test.ts ✅ Passed 125ms
tests/responses-create-advanced.test.ts ✅ Passed 162ms
tests/responses-create-disconnect.test.ts ✅ Passed 1.145s
tests/responses-create-errors.test.ts ✅ Passed 202ms
tests/responses-create-malformed-api-responses.test.ts ✅ Passed 212ms
tests/responses-create-retries.test.ts ✅ Passed 344ms
tests/responses-create-stream-failures.test.ts ✅ Passed 257ms
tests/responses-create-stream-timeout.test.ts ✅ Passed 2.22s
tests/responses-create-stream-wire.test.ts ✅ Passed 2.622s
tests/responses-create-stream.test.ts ✅ Passed 87ms
tests/responses-create-terminal-states.test.ts ✅ Passed 228ms
tests/responses-create-timeout.test.ts ✅ Passed 215ms
tests/responses-create.test.ts ✅ Passed 247ms
tests/responses-delete.test.ts ✅ Passed 252ms
tests/responses-input-items-errors.test.ts ✅ Passed 277ms
tests/responses-input-items-list.test.ts ✅ Passed 268ms
tests/responses-input-items-options.test.ts ✅ Passed 193ms
tests/responses-input-tokens-count-timeout.test.ts ✅ Passed 235ms
tests/responses-input-tokens-count.test.ts ✅ Passed 203ms
tests/responses-malformed-inputs.test.ts ✅ Passed 2.379s
tests/responses-not-found-errors.test.ts ✅ Passed 263ms
tests/responses-parse.test.ts ✅ Passed 177ms
tests/responses-retrieve-retries.test.ts ✅ Passed 219ms
tests/responses-retrieve.test.ts ✅ Passed 202ms
tests/responses-stored-method-errors.test.ts ✅ Passed 518ms
tests/retry-behavior.test.ts ✅ Passed 3.072s
tests/sdk-error-shape.test.ts ✅ Passed 275ms

View OkTest run #33011045556

SDK merge (e13bfc4be1b6) · head (ac64d0911700) · base (520d60447177) · OkTest (2b1bdfd25e98)

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 71041d1950

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread src/helpers/audio.ts Resolved
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Aug 26, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Castiron custom code

✅ No new custom-code files detected.

32 mixed files remain; 0 existing customizations changed.

Compared 520d60447177 → ac64d0911700. Generated baselines verified.

32 existing customizations unchanged
  • api.md
  • scripts/castiron/README.md
  • scripts/castiron/custom_code_report.py
  • scripts/castiron/test_custom_code_report.py
  • src/client.ts
  • src/resources/audio/transcriptions.ts
  • src/resources/audio/translations.ts
  • src/resources/beta/assistants.ts
  • src/resources/beta/beta.ts
  • src/resources/beta/index.ts
  • src/resources/beta/responses/internal-base.ts
  • src/resources/beta/responses/responses.ts
  • src/resources/beta/threads/index.ts
  • src/resources/beta/threads/runs/index.ts
  • src/resources/beta/threads/runs/runs.ts
  • src/resources/beta/threads/threads.ts
  • src/resources/chat/completions/completions.ts
  • src/resources/chat/completions/index.ts
  • src/resources/conversations/index.ts
  • src/resources/embeddings.ts
  • src/resources/files.ts
  • src/resources/fine-tuning/checkpoints/permissions.ts
  • src/resources/images.ts
  • src/resources/responses/internal-base.ts
  • src/resources/responses/responses.ts
  • src/resources/skills/skills.ts
  • src/resources/skills/versions/versions.ts
  • src/resources/vector-stores/file-batches.ts
  • src/resources/vector-stores/files.ts
  • src/resources/webhooks/index.ts
  • src/resources/webhooks/webhooks.ts
  • tests/lib/data-residency.test.ts

A changed generated baseline means this report cannot reliably identify which handwritten lines changed.

Inspect the custom-code diff

Download the exact patch produced by this run (requires repository access):

gh run download 33011076812 --repo openai/openai-node \
  --name castiron-custom-code-33011076812-1 --dir /tmp/castiron-custom-code-33011076812-1
git apply --stat /tmp/castiron-custom-code-33011076812-1/custom-code.patch
cat /tmp/castiron-custom-code-33011076812-1/custom-code.patch

Or reproduce it from an SDK checkout containing the vendored reporter:

git fetch --no-tags origin 520d6044717790d922e9659427518850a80a0345 ac64d0911700060062b3ecb5f984b78b9df6b7f3
python3 scripts/castiron/custom_code_report.py report \
  --base 520d6044717790d922e9659427518850a80a0345 \
  --head ac64d0911700060062b3ecb5f984b78b9df6b7f3 --fetch --require-head-hash --public \
  --out /tmp/castiron-custom-code-ac64d0911700
cat /tmp/castiron-custom-code-ac64d0911700/custom-code.patch

This is the current full custom patch for mixed files, not an attribution of only the handwritten lines changed by this PR.

Full report and patch

@jbeckwith-oai jbeckwith-oai left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please address the two already-open inline P2 findings before merging: (1) reduce the new 702-line/37-case regression suite to focused coverage that does not substantially duplicate audio-recording.test.ts or conflict with the repository's test-maintainability guidance; and (2) update recordAudio's public cancellation/timeout contract to document rejection when process termination fails. I independently validated both existing threads and found no additional actionable runtime/security issue, so I am intentionally not duplicating their inline comments.

@jbeckwith-oai jbeckwith-oai left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Re-reviewed the updated commit and confirmed both requested changes are fixed: the redundant 702-line suite is replaced with focused regressions in the existing audio tests, and public recording documentation now covers cancellation/termination failures. Cancellation outcomes, cleanup, listener races, and privacy remain correct.

@HAYDEN-OAI
HAYDEN-OAI force-pushed the codex/audio-recording-cancellation-cleanup-20260826-1731-ipqqqb branch from 4f74d16 to 2e17fd3 Compare August 26, 2026 20:32
@HAYDEN-OAI
HAYDEN-OAI force-pushed the codex/audio-recording-cancellation-cleanup-20260826-1731-ipqqqb branch from 2e17fd3 to ac64d09 Compare August 26, 2026 20:33
@HAYDEN-OAI
HAYDEN-OAI added this pull request to the merge queue Aug 26, 2026
Merged via the queue into main with commit dafcac4 Aug 26, 2026
35 checks passed
@HAYDEN-OAI
HAYDEN-OAI deleted the codex/audio-recording-cancellation-cleanup-20260826-1731-ipqqqb branch August 26, 2026 20:42
@openai-sdks openai-sdks Bot mentioned this pull request Aug 26, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants