From d8e213ac8a1e37f1f1701567f0aab3b5440f8922 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Marc Herbert Date: Tue, 18 May 2021 22:49:34 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] .github/ipc_fuzzer: add back local compilation hack as a comment ... because it has definitely helped reproduce compilation issues in the past in just two lines without going through the whole setup process, see a list of examples in #4126. Signed-off-by: Marc Herbert --- .github/workflows/ipc_fuzzer.yml | 10 ++++++++++ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) diff --git a/.github/workflows/ipc_fuzzer.yml b/.github/workflows/ipc_fuzzer.yml index e91ca5b12b68..036cbc82f37e 100644 --- a/.github/workflows/ipc_fuzzer.yml +++ b/.github/workflows/ipc_fuzzer.yml @@ -7,6 +7,16 @@ # Build and run fuzzer for 5s just to check that it runs properly. If it # consistently fails in under 5s you probably did something wrong +# If you came here to quickly copy/paste the invocation of some build +# script in order to reproduce a failure reported by github then you +# will be disappointed by the Github Action below: it's magical. For a +# thorough reproduction you must follow the links above. For a quick, +# dirty and incomplete reproduction hack you can try the following two +# lines. Don't do this at home. +# +# OUT=unused_dir cmake -B oss-fuzz-build/ -S tools/oss-fuzz/ +# make -j -C oss-fuzz-build sof_ep fuzz_ipc.o + name: IPC fuzzer compile test # 'workflow_dispatch' allows running this workflow manually from the