perf(search): preserve duplicate in-place intersection candidate

[seonghobae]

Preservation state

• protected/base: main@47c6fd27de13b0da37a7db64697b869941909351
• exact head: 3c6eaad2914498d9e1b69c9334d4ed3621126994
• lifecycle: Draft / open / mergeable
• effective protected-base diff: 0 files

The original branch proposed the same in-place intersection_update() family already retained in the stronger #610/#622 evaluation lanes and attached an unverified 10–50% microbenchmark claim plus retrospective .jules/bolt.md guidance. No current representative workload establishes buyer-visible latency or memory improvement.

An ordinary non-force descendant restores the protected-base tree while preserving all generated history. The candidate is not discarded; its evaluation is consolidated behind the stronger canonical lanes instead of keeping multiple Ready branches with overlapping source authority.

Do not close on zero diff alone. PR-0 requires #610/#622 or a verified successor to integrate every valid semantic/test/fixture/evidence delta into protected ancestry. Acceptance must include repeated/missing terms, skewed postings, early/late empty intersections, score/tie ordering, index immutability and Unicode/CJK parity, followed by representative real/right-cleared wall/CPU median+p95 and allocation/peak-memory measurement.

No force push, destructive rebase, self-approval, source-neutral wake commit, gate weakening, scanner suppression, or predecessor-GREEN transfer.

[google-labs-jules]

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.

---

For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Advanced

Run ID: 602966df-8ed4-44f1-8ae5-ef5fe94b9dc6

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 47c6fd2 and 0e70781.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)

• .jules/bolt.md
• transcript_search.py

Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 1 included review per hour; 0 remain after this review.

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

TranscriptIndex.search가 첫 번째 용어의 포스팅으로 후보를 초기화합니다. 이후 intersection_update()로 교집합을 계산합니다. 빈 후보 집합은 즉시 반환합니다. 집합 교집합 최적화 학습 노트도 추가되었습니다.

Changes

집합 교집합 최적화

Layer / File(s)	Summary
검색 후보 교집합 처리 transcript_search.py, .jules/bolt.md	search가 첫 번째 고유 용어의 포스팅으로 후보를 초기화합니다. 이후 용어에는 intersection_update()를 사용합니다. 후보가 비면 빈 결과를 즉시 반환합니다. 최적화 학습 노트를 추가했습니다.

Priority: ⬇️ Low

Estimated code review effort: 2 (Simple) | ~10 minutes

Change: Refactor

Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to 3c6ea

The optimization preserves the existing search behavior, with no identified merge-blocking risk.

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5

✅ Passed checks (5 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	Docstring coverage is 100.00% which is sufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 1 functions across 1 files. (1 skipped: 1 …
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	제목은 search 성능 개선과 in-place 교집합 처리를 언급합니다. 이는 주요 변경 사항과 관련됩니다. 다만 preserve duplicate 표현은 실제 변경의 핵심인 중간 집합 생성 방지와 정확히 일치하지 않습니다.

✨ Finishing Touches

📝 Generate docstrings

• Commit to this branch
• Create a new PR

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Commit to this branch
• Create a new PR

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[seonghobae]

Closing: this change has no effective or measurable impact, so it isn't worth the review and CI cost. Thanks!

[google-labs-jules]

Closing: this change has no effective or measurable impact, so it isn't worth the review and CI cost. Thanks!

이해했습니다. 해당 작업이 더 이상 필요하지 않음을 확인하였으며, 관련된 모든 변경사항을 취소하고 작업을 중단합니다.