You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Issue created to compensate the Contributor+ member for their work on #14530
E/E issue linked to the PR - https:://www.github.com/Expensify/App/issues/169078.
Contributor+ member who reviewed the PR - @mollfpr.
Wait 7 days after the PR is deployed to production before issuing payment in case there are regressions.
The automation works!!!! @strepanier03 this issue was auto-created cuz the PR that @mollfpr reviewed was linked to an E/E issue. This is the first I've seen, if you come across any issues or have any recommendations on for updating anything, add here in a comment. thx
Thanks @strepanier03 this makes me think we need an S/O update :|
Yes to 1 and 2.
3. It's best to keep private and invite/rehire the C+ - My Hires > type name > Rehire. Mohammad Luthfi F. is @mollfpr . If you're unsure of the C+ you can make it public then post in GH asking the C+ to apply and confirm once they have.
4. No timeliness bonuses for internal PR reviews
You don't need to do regression test steps, those would be handled by the BZ assigned to the E/E issue
@mallenexpensify I was assigned another one of these (#14710). Given that it's created and assigned before the PR is merged, and then we have to wait until 7 days after deploy to pay out, I think it would help to add the following details to the GH issue description.
Ask the Bug-Zero assignee to hire the C+ on the upwork job immediately
Set to a Weekly
Check in a week later, and if the issue has been deployed, update the issue title with the payment date (7 days after deploy to prod). If it isn't deployed, leave a comment and wait another week.
Currently the new issue is created once the C+ has approved a PR because that is the trigger to denote they're due payment.
Agree with your steps
Ask the Bug-Zero assignee to hire the C+ on the upwork job immediately
Set to a Weekly
Check in a week later, and if the issue has been deployed, update the issue title with the payment date (7 days after deploy to prod). If it isn't deployed, leave a comment and wait another week.
@mountiny before we create a GH to update, do you have any thoughts/ideas here?
Yeah this one is a bit tricky, we can do this, I can also try to edit the PR so the link to this issue is added to the PR body so once deployed it will automatically get updated using our automation. But that is a bigger improvement and not sure if it would go well.
Cool, thank you, everyone. I'm moving to weekly for now and stay really on top of GHs so I don't think this will be an issue. Once the HOLD is put on it after the push to prod I'll move back to Daily if it doesn't do it automatically.
Activity
melvin-bot commentedon Jan 25, 2023
Triggered auto assignment to @strepanier03 (
Bug), see https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/14418 for more details.mallenexpensify commentedon Jan 25, 2023
The automation works!!!! @strepanier03 this issue was auto-created cuz the PR that @mollfpr reviewed was linked to an E/E issue. This is the first I've seen, if you come across any issues or have any recommendations on for updating anything, add here in a comment. thx
strepanier03 commentedon Jan 25, 2023
Thanks @mallenexpensify, handling this now and will let you know any feedback or questions I run into.
strepanier03 commentedon Jan 26, 2023
@mallenexpensify - Can you review what I think needs to be done here and let me know if I'm off base anywhere?
Questions:
Do I need to handle any regression test tasks for this?
mallenexpensify commentedon Jan 27, 2023
Thanks @strepanier03 this makes me think we need an S/O update :|
Yes to 1 and 2.
3. It's best to keep private and invite/rehire the C+ - My Hires > type name > Rehire.
Mohammad Luthfi F.is @mollfpr . If you're unsure of the C+ you can make it public then post in GH asking the C+ to apply and confirm once they have.4. No timeliness bonuses for internal PR reviews
You don't need to do regression test steps, those would be handled by the BZ assigned to the E/E issue
strepanier03 commentedon Jan 27, 2023
Wonderful, thank you @mallenexpensify.
strepanier03 commentedon Jan 30, 2023
Waiting for push to prod on this and update to title for payment hold.
sakluger commentedon Feb 1, 2023
@mallenexpensify I was assigned another one of these (#14710). Given that it's created and assigned before the PR is merged, and then we have to wait until 7 days after deploy to pay out, I think it would help to add the following details to the GH issue description.
strepanier03 commentedon Feb 1, 2023
Commenting to remove overdue, and to agree with Sasha's comments above.
mallenexpensify commentedon Feb 2, 2023
Currently the new issue is created once the C+ has approved a PR because that is the trigger to denote they're due payment.
Agree with your steps
@mountiny before we create a GH to update, do you have any thoughts/ideas here?
mountiny commentedon Feb 3, 2023
Yeah this one is a bit tricky, we can do this, I can also try to edit the PR so the link to this issue is added to the PR body so once deployed it will automatically get updated using our automation. But that is a bigger improvement and not sure if it would go well.
Making this weekly sounds good to me
strepanier03 commentedon Feb 3, 2023
Cool, thank you, everyone. I'm moving to weekly for now and stay really on top of GHs so I don't think this will be an issue. Once the HOLD is put on it after the push to prod I'll move back to Daily if it doesn't do it automatically.
mountiny commentedon Feb 6, 2023
I think there must have been some miscommunication but @mallenexpensify created another issue for this here #14643
already done and settled, closing