Skip to content

[HOLD for payment 2023-09-07] Make animations within RHP consistent and reliable #22372

Closed

Description

@mountiny

Problem

Navigating between flows in RHP does not have animations. For exmaple if you go from search to new Group using shortcuts or if you navigate to new money request confirmation modal and then you click on details of the recipient there is no animation for the User details page in RHP.

Screen.Recording.2023-07-07.at.1.16.40.AM.mov

Solution

Lets make this animations consistent, everytime we push, replace or pop a page within RHP no matter what flow they are at, lets have the same slide in and out animation.

Activity

  1. added
    BugSomething is broken. Auto assigns a BugZero manager.
    on Jul 6, 2023
  2. self-assigned this
    on Jul 6, 2023
  3. melvin-bot commented on Jul 6, 2023

    @melvin-bot

    Triggered auto assignment to @flaviadefaria (Bug), see https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/14418 for more details.

  4. melvin-bot commented on Jul 6, 2023

    @melvin-bot

    Bug0 Triage Checklist (Main S/O)

    • This "bug" occurs on a supported platform (ensure Platforms in OP are ✅)
    • This bug is not a duplicate report (check E/App issues and #expensify-bugs)
      • If it is, comment with a link to the original report, close the issue and add any novel details to the original issue instead
    • This bug is reproducible using the reproduction steps in the OP. S/O
      • If the reproduction steps are clear and you're unable to reproduce the bug, check with the reporter and QA first, then close the issue.
      • If the reproduction steps aren't clear and you determine the correct steps, please update the OP.
    • This issue is filled out as thoroughly and clearly as possible
      • Pay special attention to the title, results, platforms where the bug occurs, and if the bug happens on staging/production.
    • I have reviewed and subscribed to the linked Slack conversation to ensure Slack/Github stay in sync
  5. added and removed on Jul 6, 2023
  6. mountiny commented on Jul 6, 2023

    @mountiny
    ContributorAuthor

    @WoLewicki @adamgrzybowski this will be our next one to tackle after the remounting issue.

    @flaviadefaria no need to act on this one, making it weekly, SWM will handle this

  7. mountiny commented on Jul 10, 2023

    @mountiny
    ContributorAuthor

    This should be partially solved by #22437

  8. 10 remaining items

  9. added
    Awaiting PaymentAuto-added when associated PR is deployed to production
    and removed on Aug 31, 2023
  10. changed the title [-]Make animations within RHP consistent and reliable[/-] [+][HOLD for payment 2023-09-07] Make animations within RHP consistent and reliable[/+] on Aug 31, 2023
  11. melvin-bot commented on Aug 31, 2023

    @melvin-bot

    Reviewing label has been removed, please complete the "BugZero Checklist".

  12. melvin-bot commented on Aug 31, 2023

    @melvin-bot

    The solution for this issue has been 🚀 deployed to production 🚀 in version 1.3.60-3 and is now subject to a 7-day regression period 📆. Here is the list of pull requests that resolve this issue:

    If no regressions arise, payment will be issued on 2023-09-07. 🎊

    After the hold period is over and BZ checklist items are completed, please complete any of the applicable payments for this issue, and check them off once done.

    • External issue reporter
    • Contributor that fixed the issue
    • Contributor+ that helped on the issue and/or PR

    As a reminder, here are the bonuses/penalties that should be applied for any External issue:

    • Merged PR within 3 business days of assignment - 50% bonus
    • Merged PR more than 9 business days after assignment - 50% penalty
  13. melvin-bot commented on Aug 31, 2023

    @melvin-bot

    BugZero Checklist: The PR fixing this issue has been merged! The following checklist (instructions) will need to be completed before the issue can be closed:

    • [@mountiny] The PR that introduced the bug has been identified. Link to the PR:
    • [@mountiny] The offending PR has been commented on, pointing out the bug it caused and why, so the author and reviewers can learn from the mistake. Link to comment:
    • [@mountiny] A discussion in #expensify-bugs has been started about whether any other steps should be taken (e.g. updating the PR review checklist) in order to catch this type of bug sooner. Link to discussion:
    • [@mountiny] Determine if we should create a regression test for this bug.
    • [@mountiny] If we decide to create a regression test for the bug, please propose the regression test steps to ensure the same bug will not reach production again.
    • [@flaviadefaria] Link the GH issue for creating/updating the regression test once above steps have been agreed upon:
  14. flaviadefaria commented on Sep 4, 2023

    @flaviadefaria
    Contributor

    @mountiny just catching up, do I need to take any action at all here?

  15. mountiny commented on Sep 4, 2023

    @mountiny
    ContributorAuthor

    I think this is fine and we can handle the payments here #20404

    Also we would make more specific issue for the animation as this is an old issue just for clarity, deployed going to close this out

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Labels

Awaiting PaymentAuto-added when associated PR is deployed to productionBugSomething is broken. Auto assigns a BugZero manager.ReviewingHas a PR in reviewWeeklyKSv2

Type

No type

Projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions