You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
[HOLD for c+ payment in newdot] [$1000] Dev: "0:undefined:" displayed in reaction emoji tooltip #23307
"0:undefined:" displayed should not displayed in reaction emoji tooltip
Actual Result:
"0:undefined:" displayed in reaction emoji tooltip
Workaround:
Unknown
Platforms:
Which of our officially supported platforms is this issue occurring on?
Android / native
Android / Chrome
iOS / native
iOS / Safari
MacOS / Chrome / Safari
MacOS / Desktop
Version Number: Dev v1.3.43-2 Reproducible in staging?: n/a Reproducible in production?: n/a If this was caught during regression testing, add the test name, ID and link from TestRail: Email or phone of affected tester (no customers): Logs:https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/4856 Notes/Photos/Videos: Any additional supporting documentation
We pass reaction.emoji to showReactionList in this line.
But showReactionList requires emojiName, so "0:undefined:" displayed in reaction emoji tooltip.
What changes do you think we should make in order to solve the problem?
We should pass reaction.emojiName to showReactionList.
changed the title [-]Dev: "0:undefined:" displayed in reaction emoji tooltip[/-][+][$1000] Dev: "0:undefined:" displayed in reaction emoji tooltip[/+]on Jul 20, 2023
The solution for this issue has been 🚀 deployed to production 🚀 in version 1.3.46-2 and is now subject to a 7-day regression period 📆. Here is the list of pull requests that resolve this issue:
If no regressions arise, payment will be issued on 2023-08-03. 🎊
After the hold period is over and BZ checklist items are completed, please complete any of the applicable payments for this issue, and check them off once done.
External issue reporter
Contributor that fixed the issue
Contributor+ that helped on the issue and/or PR
For reference, here are some details about the assignees on this issue:
@Santhosh-Sellaveldoes not require payment (Eligable for Manual Requests)
BugZero Checklist: The PR fixing this issue has been merged! The following checklist (instructions) will need to be completed before the issue can be closed:
[@Santhosh-Sellavel] The PR that introduced the bug has been identified. Link to the PR:
[@Santhosh-Sellavel] The offending PR has been commented on, pointing out the bug it caused and why, so the author and reviewers can learn from the mistake. Link to comment:
[@Santhosh-Sellavel] A discussion in #expensify-bugs has been started about whether any other steps should be taken (e.g. updating the PR review checklist) in order to catch this type of bug sooner. Link to discussion:
[@Santhosh-Sellavel] Determine if we should create a regression test for this bug.
[@Santhosh-Sellavel] If we decide to create a regression test for the bug, please propose the regression test steps to ensure the same bug will not reach production again.
[@kadiealexander] Link the GH issue for creating/updating the regression test once above steps have been agreed upon:
@kadiealexander I think this qualifies for a speed bonus, please check as it completed 72 business hours, not sure why Melvin didn't trigger that comment.
BugZero Checklist: The PR fixing this issue has been merged! The following checklist (instructions) will need to be completed before the issue can be closed:
[@Santhosh-Sellavel] The PR that introduced the bug has been identified. Link to the PR: As per this comment, we are just improving the changes missed out here
[@stitesExpensify] The offending PR has been commented on, pointing out the bug it caused and why, so the author and reviewers can learn from the mistake. Link to comment:
[@Santhosh-Sellavel] A discussion in #expensify-bugs has been started about whether any other steps should be taken (e.g. updating the PR review checklist) in order to catch this type of bug sooner. Link to discussion: N/A should be caught while testing
[@Santhosh-Sellavel] Determine if we should create a regression test for this bug. N/A As its really basic UI
[@Santhosh-Sellavel] If we decide to create a regression test for the bug, please propose the regression test steps to ensure the same bug will not reach production again.
[@kadiealexander] Link the GH issue for creating/updating the regression test once the above steps have been agreed upon:
@stitesExpensify Do you agree with the above, if so please check off 2nd alone. Thanks, If you differ on any of the above please let me know thanks!
@kadiealexander I think this qualifies for a speed bonus, please check as it completed 72 business hours, not sure why Melvin didn't trigger that comment.
@kadiealexander Can you check this summarize so I can collect payment on ND, thanks!
changed the title [-][HOLD for payment 2023-08-03] [$1000] Dev: "0:undefined:" displayed in reaction emoji tooltip[/-][+][HOLD for c+ payment in newdot] [$1000] Dev: "0:undefined:" displayed in reaction emoji tooltip[/+]on Aug 4, 2023
Reviewed details for @Santhosh-Sellavel. These details are accurate based on summary from Business Reviewer and are now approved for payment in NewDot.
Activity
melvin-bot commentedon Jul 20, 2023
Triggered auto assignment to @kadiealexander (
Bug), see https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/14418 for more details.melvin-bot commentedon Jul 20, 2023
Bug0 Triage Checklist (Main S/O)
Platformsin OP are ✅)StevenKKC commentedon Jul 20, 2023
Proposal
Please re-state the problem that we are trying to solve in this issue.
"0:undefined:" displayed in reaction emoji tooltip.
What is the root cause of that problem?
Reaction emoji tooltip is displayed by following code.
App/src/components/Reactions/ReportActionItemEmojiReactions.js
Lines 98 to 100 in 7fea760
We pass
reaction.emojitoshowReactionListin this line.But
showReactionListrequiresemojiName, so "0:undefined:" displayed in reaction emoji tooltip.What changes do you think we should make in order to solve the problem?
We should pass
reaction.emojiNametoshowReactionList.And in this line, there is no
hasAccountIDReactedfunction inReport.js.We should change to
hasAccountIDEmojiReactedfunction.What alternative solutions did you explore? (Optional)
None.
ayazhussain79 commentedon Jul 20, 2023
This bug might be regression of this PR
jfquevedol2198 commentedon Jul 20, 2023
Proposal
Please re-state the problem that we are trying to solve in this issue.
Dev: "0:undefined:" displayed in reaction emoji tooltip
What is the root cause of that problem?
reaction.emojiis undefined.App/src/components/Reactions/ReportActionItemEmojiReactions.js
Lines 98 to 100 in 7fea760
Report.hasAccountIDReactedis not found.App/src/pages/home/report/ReactionList/PopoverReactionList.js
Line 189 in 7fea760
What changes do you think we should make in order to solve the problem?
By doing this: popup should look like follows, Its missing Emoji on Popup.

App/src/libs/EmojiUtils.js
Lines 395 to 406 in 7fea760
In
EmojiUtils.getUniqueEmojiCodes,users should be
But on
PopoverReactionsList, its passing like this:Update this line so that we will get users in
[ {accountID, skinTones: {createdAt, skinTone}} ]type.RESULT
What alternative solutions did you explore? (Optional)
stitesExpensify commentedon Jul 20, 2023
I agree that this is most likely a regression from that PR.
[-]Dev: "0:undefined:" displayed in reaction emoji tooltip[/-][+][$1000] Dev: "0:undefined:" displayed in reaction emoji tooltip[/+]24 remaining items
melvin-bot commentedon Jul 27, 2023
The solution for this issue has been 🚀 deployed to production 🚀 in version 1.3.46-2 and is now subject to a 7-day regression period 📆. Here is the list of pull requests that resolve this issue:
If no regressions arise, payment will be issued on 2023-08-03. 🎊
After the hold period is over and BZ checklist items are completed, please complete any of the applicable payments for this issue, and check them off once done.
For reference, here are some details about the assignees on this issue:
As a reminder, here are the bonuses/penalties that should be applied for any External issue:
melvin-bot commentedon Jul 27, 2023
BugZero Checklist: The PR fixing this issue has been merged! The following checklist (instructions) will need to be completed before the issue can be closed:
Santhosh-Sellavel commentedon Aug 3, 2023
@jfquevedol2198 This is due for payment today, and payment will be handled by @kadiealexander!
Santhosh-Sellavel commentedon Aug 3, 2023
@kadiealexander I think this qualifies for a speed bonus, please check as it completed 72 business hours, not sure why Melvin didn't trigger that comment.
Santhosh-Sellavel commentedon Aug 3, 2023
BugZero Checklist: The PR fixing this issue has been merged! The following checklist (instructions) will need to be completed before the issue can be closed:
@stitesExpensify Do you agree with the above, if so please check off 2nd alone. Thanks, If you differ on any of the above please let me know thanks!
Santhosh-Sellavel commentedon Aug 3, 2023
@kadiealexander Can you check this summarize so I can collect payment on ND, thanks!
kadiealexander commentedon Aug 3, 2023
Payouts due:
Eligible for 50% #urgency bonus? Yes
Upwork job is here.
Santhosh-Sellavel commentedon Aug 4, 2023
Thanks, Requested Payment on ND!
[-][HOLD for payment 2023-08-03] [$1000] Dev: "0:undefined:" displayed in reaction emoji tooltip[/-][+][HOLD for c+ payment in newdot] [$1000] Dev: "0:undefined:" displayed in reaction emoji tooltip[/+]JmillsExpensify commentedon Aug 4, 2023
Reviewed details for @Santhosh-Sellavel. These details are accurate based on summary from Business Reviewer and are now approved for payment in NewDot.