Skip to content

Preferences - The description of Priority mode does not match the logic #23903

Closed

Description

@kbecciv

If you haven’t already, check out our contributing guidelines for onboarding and email contributors@expensify.com to request to join our Slack channel!


Action Performed:

  1. Open setting
  2. Preferences
  3. Priority mode, Observe that explainer text does not match focus mode

Expected Result:

The description of the focus mode must match the logic including: pined, unread and draft item

Actual Result:

Explainer text does not match logic focus mode

Workaround:

Unknown

Platforms:

Which of our officially supported platforms is this issue occurring on?

  • Android / native
  • Android / Chrome
  • iOS / native
  • iOS / Safari
  • MacOS / Chrome / Safari
  • MacOS / Desktop

Version Number: 1.3.47.3
Reproducible in staging?: y
Reproducible in production?: y
If this was caught during regression testing, add the test name, ID and link from TestRail:
Email or phone of affected tester (no customers):
Logs: https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/4856
Notes/Photos/Videos: Any additional supporting documentation

Screenshot 2023-07-30 at 01 19 33

image (12)

Expensify/Expensify Issue URL:
Issue reported by: @namhihi237
Slack conversation: https://expensify.slack.com/archives/C049HHMV9SM/p1690654739888759

View all open jobs on GitHub

Activity

  1. added
    BugSomething is broken. Auto assigns a BugZero manager.
    on Jul 30, 2023
  2. melvin-bot commented on Jul 30, 2023

    @melvin-bot

    Triggered auto assignment to @tjferriss (Bug), see https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/14418 for more details.

  3. melvin-bot commented on Jul 30, 2023

    @melvin-bot

    Bug0 Triage Checklist (Main S/O)

    • This "bug" occurs on a supported platform (ensure Platforms in OP are ✅)
    • This bug is not a duplicate report (check E/App issues and #expensify-bugs)
      • If it is, comment with a link to the original report, close the issue and add any novel details to the original issue instead
    • This bug is reproducible using the reproduction steps in the OP. S/O
      • If the reproduction steps are clear and you're unable to reproduce the bug, check with the reporter and QA first, then close the issue.
      • If the reproduction steps aren't clear and you determine the correct steps, please update the OP.
    • This issue is filled out as thoroughly and clearly as possible
      • Pay special attention to the title, results, platforms where the bug occurs, and if the bug happens on staging/production.
    • I have reviewed and subscribed to the linked Slack conversation to ensure Slack/Github stay in sync
  4. kbecciv commented on Jul 30, 2023

    @kbecciv
    Author

    Proposal by: @namhihi237
    Slack conversation: https://expensify.slack.com/archives/C049HHMV9SM/p1690654739888759

    Proposal

    Please re-state the problem that we are trying to solve in this issue.

    The description of the focus mode must match the logic including: pined, unread and draft item

    What is the root cause of that problem?

    Currently, the logic of the show report on LHN of focus mode is unread, pined, and drafted but the description for focus is incomplete and confusing for users.

    What changes do you think we should make in order to solve the problem?

    We need to update the description for focus mode here:

    explainerText: 'Choose whether to show all chats by default sorted with most recent with pinned items at the top, or #focus on unread pinned items, sorted alphabetically.',

    Can be like this:
    Choose whether to show all chats by default sorted with most recent with pinned items at the top, or #focus on unread, pinned, and draft items, sorted alphabetically.
    description: 'Only show unread sorted alphabetically',

    Show unread, pined, and draft sorted alphabetically
    And Spanish translation

    What alternative solutions did you explore? (Optional)

    N/A

  5. jeet-dhandha commented on Jul 31, 2023

    @jeet-dhandha
    Contributor

    Proposal

    Please re-state the problem that we are trying to solve in this issue.

    • Explainer Text doesn't match Priority modes description.

    What is the root cause of that problem?

    What changes do you think we should make in order to solve the problem?

    • We can first update explainer text as below:

      • BEFORE: Choose whether to show all chats by default sorted with most recent with pinned items at the top, or #focus on unread pinned items, sorted alphabetically.
      • UPDATED: Choose whether to show all chats sorted with the most recent and pinned items at the top by default, or #focus on unread and pinned chats sorted alphabetically. (Fixed some writing issues using grammerly)
      • UPDATED SPANISH: Elige si mostrar todas las conversaciones ordenadas con las más recientes y los elementos anclados en la parte superior de manera predeterminada, o #enfocarse en las conversaciones no leídas y ancladas ordenadas alfabéticamente.
    • Now we also need to update #focus mode's description:

      • BEFORE: Only show unread sorted alphabetically
      • UPDATED: Only show unread and pinned chats, sorted alphabetically.
      • Updated SPANISH: "Mostrar solo chats no leídos y anclados, ordenados alfabéticamente."

    What alternative solutions did you explore? (Optional)

    • N/A
  6. jeet-dhandha commented on Jul 31, 2023

    @jeet-dhandha
    Contributor

    Now i forgot about the draft items will update that shortly. 👍

  7. tjferriss commented on Aug 1, 2023

    @tjferriss
    Contributor

    Determining whether we assign copy updates externally. Discussing here.

  8. tjferriss commented on Aug 3, 2023

    @tjferriss
    Contributor

    I'm going to close this out as it's more of an improvement suggestion rather than a bug preventing someone from using the app.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

BugSomething is broken. Auto assigns a BugZero manager.DailyKSv2

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions