Skip to content

[HOLD for payment 2023-10-18] [$500] Two "Flag as offensive" list opens #28863

Closed

Description

@m-natarajan

If you haven’t already, check out our contributing guidelines for onboarding and email contributors@expensify.com to request to join our Slack channel!


Action Performed:

  1. go to any chat
  2. hover on message and right click
  3. select Flag as offensive
  4. click on back button

Expected Result:

should hide Flag as offensive list

Actual Result:

Flag as offensive list appears

Workaround:

unknown

Platforms:

Which of our officially supported platforms is this issue occurring on?

  • Android / native
  • Android / Chrome
  • iOS / native
  • iOS / Safari
  • MacOS / Chrome / Safari
  • MacOS / Desktop

Version Number: 1.3.77-5
Reproducible in staging?: y
Reproducible in production?: y
If this was caught during regression testing, add the test name, ID and link from TestRail:
Email or phone of affected tester (no customers):
Logs: https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/4856
Notes/Photos/Videos: Any additional supporting documentation

Screen.Recording.2023-10-04.at.2.24.22.PM.1.mov
Screen.Recording.2023-10-04.at.2.17.48.PM.1.mov
Recording.472.mp4

Expensify/Expensify Issue URL:
Issue reported by: @gadhiyamanan
Slack conversation: https://expensify.slack.com/archives/C049HHMV9SM/p1696409294638669

View all open jobs on GitHub

Upwork Automation - Do Not Edit
  • Upwork Job URL: https://www.upwork.com/jobs/~01bfd52163177c5b7e
  • Upwork Job ID: 1709673665006915584
  • Last Price Increase: 2023-10-04
  • Automatic offers:
    • gadhiyamanan | Contributor | 27048435
    • gadhiyamanan | Reporter | 27048436

Activity

  1. added
    ExternalAdded to denote the issue can be worked on by a contributor
    on Oct 4, 2023
  2. changed the title [-]Two "Flag as offensive" list opens[/-] [+][$500] Two "Flag as offensive" list opens[/+] on Oct 4, 2023
  3. melvin-bot commented on Oct 4, 2023

    @melvin-bot
  4. added
    Help WantedApply this label when an issue is open to proposals by contributors
    on Oct 4, 2023
  5. melvin-bot commented on Oct 4, 2023

    @melvin-bot

    Triggered auto assignment to Contributor-plus team member for initial proposal review - @burczu (External)

  6. m-natarajan commented on Oct 4, 2023

    @m-natarajan
    Author

    Proposal by @gadhiyamanan

    Please re-state the problem that we are trying to solve in this issue.

    two Flag as offensive list open

    What is the root cause of that problem?

    We are navigate to flag comment two times here and here

    What changes do you think we should make in order to solve the problem?

    add return after hideContextMenu and navigate to flag comment

    if (closePopover) {
    hideContextMenu(false, () => Navigation.navigate(ROUTES.FLAG_COMMENT.getRoute(reportID, reportAction.reportActionID)));
    }

  7. ayazalavi commented on Oct 5, 2023

    @ayazalavi
    Contributor

    Proposal

    Please re-state the problem that we are trying to solve in this issue.

    Clicking on context menu item Flag as offensive opens a popover but it is not getting closed.

    What is the root cause of that problem?

    There is redundant call to navigate method in onPress event of the menu item

    onPress: (closePopover, {reportID, reportAction}) => {
    if (closePopover) {
    hideContextMenu(false, () => Navigation.navigate(ROUTES.FLAG_COMMENT.getRoute(reportID, reportAction.reportActionID)));
    }
    Navigation.navigate(ROUTES.FLAG_COMMENT.getRoute(reportID, reportAction.reportActionID));
    },

    What changes do you think we should make in order to solve the problem?

    We need to confirm why 2 times above callback is being called and if second callback is not necessary then remove it

    Navigation.navigate(ROUTES.FLAG_COMMENT.getRoute(reportID, reportAction.reportActionID));
    or simply returning after hideContextMenu call will also fix the issue

    What alternative solutions did you explore? (Optional)

    N/A

  8. maxconnectAbhi commented on Oct 5, 2023

    @maxconnectAbhi

    
# Proposal

    Please re-state the problem that we are trying to solve in this issue

    "Flag as offensive" list modal opens two times

    What is the root cause of that problem?

    Following callback is the root cause

    onPress: (closePopover, {reportID, reportAction}) => { 
         if (closePopover) { 
             hideContextMenu(false, () => Navigation.navigate(ROUTES.FLAG_COMMENT.getRoute(reportID, reportAction.reportActionID))); 
         } 
      
         Navigation.navigate(ROUTES.FLAG_COMMENT.getRoute(reportID, reportAction.reportActionID)); 
     }, 
    

    What changes do you think we should make in order to solve the problem?

    In above callback we need to remove one Navigation call

    What alternative solutions did you explore? (Optional)

    NA

  9. burczu commented on Oct 5, 2023

    @burczu
    Contributor

    I've reviewed all the proposals and all of them define the root cause correctly but I think the best solution (and the first one) is the one from @gadhiyamanan - I believe here the return statement is just missing in the if block - we can compare it with similar implementations of onPress method for other context menu items in the ContextMenuActions.js - they are similar so I believe calling navigate twice is intended.

    🎀 👀 🎀 C+ reviewed

  10. melvin-bot commented on Oct 5, 2023

    @melvin-bot

    Triggered auto assignment to @francoisl, see https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/7972 for more details.

  11. gadhiyamanan commented on Oct 5, 2023

    @gadhiyamanan
    Contributor

    @m-natarajan is from QA team and he posted solution from slack

    cc: @burczu @francoisl

  12. burczu commented on Oct 5, 2023

    @burczu
    Contributor

    @gadhiyamanan Ahh... sorry, I didn't notice it! Updated!

  13. 17 remaining items

  14. melvin-bot commented on Oct 10, 2023

    @melvin-bot

    Bug0 Triage Checklist (Main S/O)

    • This "bug" occurs on a supported platform (ensure Platforms in OP are ✅)
    • This bug is not a duplicate report (check E/App issues and #expensify-bugs)
      • If it is, comment with a link to the original report, close the issue and add any novel details to the original issue instead
    • This bug is reproducible using the reproduction steps in the OP. S/O
      • If the reproduction steps are clear and you're unable to reproduce the bug, check with the reporter and QA first, then close the issue.
      • If the reproduction steps aren't clear and you determine the correct steps, please update the OP.
    • This issue is filled out as thoroughly and clearly as possible
      • Pay special attention to the title, results, platforms where the bug occurs, and if the bug happens on staging/production.
    • I have reviewed and subscribed to the linked Slack conversation to ensure Slack/Github stay in sync
  15. added
    Awaiting PaymentAuto-added when associated PR is deployed to production
    and removed on Oct 11, 2023
  16. changed the title [-][$500] Two "Flag as offensive" list opens[/-] [+][HOLD for payment 2023-10-18] [$500] Two "Flag as offensive" list opens[/+] on Oct 11, 2023
  17. melvin-bot commented on Oct 11, 2023

    @melvin-bot

    Reviewing label has been removed, please complete the "BugZero Checklist".

  18. melvin-bot commented on Oct 11, 2023

    @melvin-bot

    The solution for this issue has been 🚀 deployed to production 🚀 in version 1.3.80-3 and is now subject to a 7-day regression period 📆. Here is the list of pull requests that resolve this issue:

    If no regressions arise, payment will be issued on 2023-10-18. 🎊

    After the hold period is over and BZ checklist items are completed, please complete any of the applicable payments for this issue, and check them off once done.

    • External issue reporter
    • Contributor that fixed the issue
    • Contributor+ that helped on the issue and/or PR

    For reference, here are some details about the assignees on this issue:

    As a reminder, here are the bonuses/penalties that should be applied for any External issue:

    • Merged PR within 3 business days of assignment - 50% bonus
    • Merged PR more than 9 business days after assignment - 50% penalty
  19. melvin-bot commented on Oct 11, 2023

    @melvin-bot

    BugZero Checklist: The PR fixing this issue has been merged! The following checklist (instructions) will need to be completed before the issue can be closed:

    • [@burczu] The PR that introduced the bug has been identified. Link to the PR:
    • [@burczu] The offending PR has been commented on, pointing out the bug it caused and why, so the author and reviewers can learn from the mistake. Link to comment:
    • [@burczu] A discussion in #expensify-bugs has been started about whether any other steps should be taken (e.g. updating the PR review checklist) in order to catch this type of bug sooner. Link to discussion:
    • [@burczu] Determine if we should create a regression test for this bug.
    • [@burczu] If we decide to create a regression test for the bug, please propose the regression test steps to ensure the same bug will not reach production again.
    • [@bfitzexpensify] Link the GH issue for creating/updating the regression test once above steps have been agreed upon:
  20. burczu commented on Oct 17, 2023

    @burczu
    Contributor

    BugZero Checklist: The PR fixing this issue has been merged! The following checklist (instructions) will need to be completed before the issue can be closed:

    • [@burczu] The PR that introduced the bug has been identified. Link to the PR: No regression - it was just done this way from the beginning.
    • [@burczu] The offending PR has been commented on, pointing out the bug it caused and why, so the author and reviewers can learn from the mistake. Link to comment: n/a
    • [@burczu] A discussion in #expensify-bugs has been started about whether any other steps should be taken (e.g. updating the PR review checklist) in order to catch this type of bug sooner. Link to discussion: n/a
    • [@burczu] Determine if we should create a regression test for this bug.
    • [@burczu] If we decide to create a regression test for the bug, please propose the regression test steps to ensure the same bug will not reach production again.
    • [@bfitzexpensify] Link the GH issue for creating/updating the regression test once above steps have been agreed upon:
  21. bfitzexpensify commented on Oct 18, 2023

    @bfitzexpensify
    Contributor

    Payments complete and BZ checklist done, we're all done here, thanks everyone.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Labels

Awaiting PaymentAuto-added when associated PR is deployed to productionBugSomething is broken. Auto assigns a BugZero manager.DailyKSv2ExternalAdded to denote the issue can be worked on by a contributor

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions