You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
[HOLD for payment 2023-11-13] Android - Bank - After opening calendar for incorporation date day that comes before is selected #30871
Version Number: 1.3.95-5 Reproducible in staging?: Y Reproducible in production?: N If this was caught during regression testing, add the test name, ID and link from TestRail: Email or phone of affected tester (no customers): Logs:https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/4856 Expensify/Expensify Issue URL:
**Issue reported by:**Applause - Internal Team Slack conversation:
👋 Friendly reminder that deploy blockers are time-sensitive ⏱ issues! Check out the open StagingDeployCash deploy checklist to see the list of PRs included in this release, then work quickly to do one of the following:
Identify the pull request that introduced this issue and revert it.
BugZero Checklist: The PR fixing this issue has been merged! The following checklist (instructions) will need to be completed before the issue can be closed:
[@allroundexperts] The PR that introduced the bug has been identified. Link to the PR:
[@allroundexperts] The offending PR has been commented on, pointing out the bug it caused and why, so the author and reviewers can learn from the mistake. Link to comment:
[@allroundexperts] A discussion in #expensify-bugs has been started about whether any other steps should be taken (e.g. updating the PR review checklist) in order to catch this type of bug sooner. Link to discussion:
[@allroundexperts] Determine if we should create a regression test for this bug.
[@allroundexperts] If we decide to create a regression test for the bug, please propose the regression test steps to ensure the same bug will not reach production again.
[@bfitzexpensify] Link the GH issue for creating/updating the regression test once above steps have been agreed upon:
I'd like to clarify the relationship between the solution in this issue and the solution for #30792. It sounds like they had the same root cause, but there are separate PRs to fix the two issues. Are they closely enough aligned to consider them as one solution?
@bfitzexpensify they are exactly the same issue. new Date() was used instead of parseISO() in a lot of places. #30792 was fixed by updating a few of those instances, this issue was fixed by updating a few more. There are still others.
Thanks for confirming @erquhart. And yes, the other payments + BZ checklist will happen in #30792, so the only action here is payment for @situchan — the offer has been sent.
Activity
melvin-bot commentedon Nov 3, 2023
Triggered auto assignment to @bfitzexpensify (
Bug), see https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/14418 for more details.melvin-bot commentedon Nov 3, 2023
Bug0 Triage Checklist (Main S/O)
Platformsin OP are ✅)OSBotify commentedon Nov 3, 2023
👋 Friendly reminder that deploy blockers are time-sensitive ⏱ issues! Check out the open
StagingDeployCashdeploy checklist to see the list of PRs included in this release, then work quickly to do one of the following:melvin-bot commentedon Nov 3, 2023
Triggered auto assignment to @tgolen (
Engineering), see https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/4319 for more details.tgolen commentedon Nov 3, 2023
@allroundexperts Do you think this has anything to do with some of the changes you've made related to #30845 ?
erquhart commentedon Nov 3, 2023
@tgolen @allroundexperts
new Date()is still in use as an ISO string parser in a few places, Android DatePicker is one of them:App/src/components/DatePicker/index.android.js
Line 64 in aa30ef2
Need to swap that for first one for date-fns
parseISO().This is the same root cause as #30792
18 remaining items
melvin-bot commentedon Nov 6, 2023
BugZero Checklist: The PR fixing this issue has been merged! The following checklist (instructions) will need to be completed before the issue can be closed:
bfitzexpensify commentedon Nov 13, 2023
I'd like to clarify the relationship between the solution in this issue and the solution for #30792. It sounds like they had the same root cause, but there are separate PRs to fix the two issues. Are they closely enough aligned to consider them as one solution?
erquhart commentedon Nov 13, 2023
@bfitzexpensify they are exactly the same issue.
new Date()was used instead ofparseISO()in a lot of places. #30792 was fixed by updating a few of those instances, this issue was fixed by updating a few more. There are still others.tgolen commentedon Nov 15, 2023
@bfitzexpensify I think this is ready to be paid out?
situchan commentedon Nov 15, 2023
I think I am only the one for payment here. Other contributors' payments are being handled in #30792.
bfitzexpensify commentedon Nov 15, 2023
Thanks for confirming @erquhart. And yes, the other payments + BZ checklist will happen in #30792, so the only action here is payment for @situchan — the offer has been sent.
bfitzexpensify commentedon Nov 15, 2023
OK, payment complete, closing this one out.