Skip to content

[HOLD for payment 2023-11-30] [$500] Public room - Extra bottom padding on the header in the sign-in modal accessed from public room #31445

Closed

Description

@kbecciv

If you haven’t already, check out our contributing guidelines for onboarding and email contributors@expensify.com to request to join our Slack channel!


Version Number: 1.4.0
Reproducible in staging?: y
Reproducible in production?: y
If this was caught during regression testing, add the test name, ID and link from TestRail:
Email or phone of affected tester (no customers):
Logs: https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/4856
Expensify/Expensify Issue URL:
Issue reported by: Applause - Internal Team
Slack conversation:

Action Performed:

  1. Log out if logged in.
  2. Navigate to a public room https://staging.new.expensify.com/r/2376199970894587
    on iOS or Android app.
  3. Tap Sign in.
  4. Scroll down the sign-in page.

Expected Result:

The padding on the header should be adequate.

Actual Result:

The bottom padding on the header is excessive.

Workaround:

Unknown

Platforms:

Which of our officially supported platforms is this issue occurring on?

  • Android: Native
  • Android: mWeb Chrome
  • iOS: Native
  • iOS: mWeb Safari
  • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • MacOS: Desktop

Screenshots/Videos

Add any screenshot/video evidence

Bug6279149_1700143096738.RPReplay_Final1700135355__1_.mp4

View all open jobs on GitHub

Upwork Automation - Do Not Edit
  • Upwork Job URL: https://www.upwork.com/jobs/~01cd50fd577deda12f
  • Upwork Job ID: 1725154866229444608
  • Last Price Increase: 2023-11-16
  • Automatic offers:
    • shubham1206agra | Reviewer | 27719696
    • ZhenjaHorbach | Contributor | 27719698

Activity

  1. added
    ExternalAdded to denote the issue can be worked on by a contributor
    BugSomething is broken. Auto assigns a BugZero manager.
    on Nov 16, 2023
  2. changed the title [-]Public room - Extra bottom padding on the header in the sign-in modal accessed from public room[/-] [+][$500] Public room - Extra bottom padding on the header in the sign-in modal accessed from public room[/+] on Nov 16, 2023
  3. melvin-bot commented on Nov 16, 2023

    @melvin-bot
  4. melvin-bot commented on Nov 16, 2023

    @melvin-bot

    Triggered auto assignment to @alexpensify (Bug), see https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/14418 for more details.

  5. added
    Help WantedApply this label when an issue is open to proposals by contributors
    on Nov 16, 2023
  6. melvin-bot commented on Nov 16, 2023

    @melvin-bot

    Bug0 Triage Checklist (Main S/O)

    • This "bug" occurs on a supported platform (ensure Platforms in OP are ✅)
    • This bug is not a duplicate report (check E/App issues and #expensify-bugs)
      • If it is, comment with a link to the original report, close the issue and add any novel details to the original issue instead
    • This bug is reproducible using the reproduction steps in the OP. S/O
      • If the reproduction steps are clear and you're unable to reproduce the bug, check with the reporter and QA first, then close the issue.
      • If the reproduction steps aren't clear and you determine the correct steps, please update the OP.
    • This issue is filled out as thoroughly and clearly as possible
      • Pay special attention to the title, results, platforms where the bug occurs, and if the bug happens on staging/production.
    • I have reviewed and subscribed to the linked Slack conversation to ensure Slack/Github stay in sync
  7. melvin-bot commented on Nov 16, 2023

    @melvin-bot

    Triggered auto assignment to Contributor-plus team member for initial proposal review - @shubham1206agra (External)

  8. ZhenjaHorbach commented on Nov 16, 2023

    @ZhenjaHorbach
    Contributor

    Proposal

    Please re-state the problem that we are trying to solve in this issue.

    Public room - Extra bottom padding on the header in the sign-in modal accessed from public room

    What is the root cause of that problem?

    the main problem is that by default we always have a padding at the top
    Which is not needed if at the top of the screen we have an additional element (in this case, a header with a back button)

    <ScreenWrapper
    style={[styles.highlightBG]}
    includeSafeAreaPaddingBottom={false}
    shouldEnableMaxHeight
    testID={SignInModal.displayName}
    >
    <HeaderWithBackButton onBackButtonPress={Navigation.dismissModal} />
    <SignInPage isInModal />
    </ScreenWrapper>

    What changes do you think we should make in order to solve the problem?

    We can update these styles and add new conditions when we pass isModal(SignInPage with header is the only place where we use isModal) with true and then set paddintTop by 0

        <View style={[styles.signInPage, StyleUtils.getSafeAreaPadding({...safeAreaInsets, bottom: 0, top: isInModal ? 0 : safeAreaInsets.top}, 1)]}>
    

    <View style={[styles.signInPage, StyleUtils.getSafeAreaPadding({...safeAreaInsets, bottom: 0}, 1)]}>

    What alternative solutions did you explore? (Optional)

    Or we can add a new property to SignInPage that will tell us if there is an additional element on top instead of the isModal in the original proposition


    Or we can set the top value by 0 for StyleUtils.getSafeAreaPadding

    <View style={[styles.signInPage, StyleUtils.getSafeAreaPadding({...safeAreaInsets, bottom: 0}, 1)]}>

    and create a wrapper component instead which will have this paddingTop
    And depending on the situation we will use SignInPage with a wrapper or not


    Or we can add the ability to pass styles and pass paddingTop: 0 here

    <SignInPage isInModal />


    Or we can make the header with the back button part of the SignInPage
    And add a new parameter
    If the parameter is true, we show the header and disable paddingTop
    If the parameter is false, we hide the header and add paddingTop

  9. alexpensify commented on Nov 16, 2023

    @alexpensify
    Contributor

    @shubham1206agra - can you review this proposal and identify if it will fix the issue? Thanks!

  10. shubham1206agra commented on Nov 17, 2023

    @shubham1206agra
    Contributor

    @alexpensify I have stumbled upon this problem in testing https://expensify.slack.com/archives/C02NK2DQWUX/p1700195328526319

    The above proposal seems fine. I will update here once I get this through.

  11. shumakmanohar commented on Nov 17, 2023

    @shumakmanohar

    How can i get access to the slack channel

  12. 13 remaining items

  13. added
    Awaiting PaymentAuto-added when associated PR is deployed to production
    and removed on Nov 23, 2023
  14. changed the title [-][$500] Public room - Extra bottom padding on the header in the sign-in modal accessed from public room[/-] [+][HOLD for payment 2023-11-30] [$500] Public room - Extra bottom padding on the header in the sign-in modal accessed from public room[/+] on Nov 23, 2023
  15. melvin-bot commented on Nov 23, 2023

    @melvin-bot

    Reviewing label has been removed, please complete the "BugZero Checklist".

  16. melvin-bot commented on Nov 23, 2023

    @melvin-bot

    The solution for this issue has been 🚀 deployed to production 🚀 in version 1.4.2-3 and is now subject to a 7-day regression period 📆. Here is the list of pull requests that resolve this issue:

    If no regressions arise, payment will be issued on 2023-11-30. 🎊

    After the hold period is over and BZ checklist items are completed, please complete any of the applicable payments for this issue, and check them off once done.

    • External issue reporter
    • Contributor that fixed the issue
    • Contributor+ that helped on the issue and/or PR

    For reference, here are some details about the assignees on this issue:

  17. melvin-bot commented on Nov 23, 2023

    @melvin-bot

    BugZero Checklist: The PR fixing this issue has been merged! The following checklist (instructions) will need to be completed before the issue can be closed:

    • [@shubham1206agra] The PR that introduced the bug has been identified. Link to the PR:
    • [@shubham1206agra] The offending PR has been commented on, pointing out the bug it caused and why, so the author and reviewers can learn from the mistake. Link to comment:
    • [@shubham1206agra] A discussion in #expensify-bugs has been started about whether any other steps should be taken (e.g. updating the PR review checklist) in order to catch this type of bug sooner. Link to discussion:
    • [@shubham1206agra] Determine if we should create a regression test for this bug.
    • [@shubham1206agra] If we decide to create a regression test for the bug, please propose the regression test steps to ensure the same bug will not reach production again.
    • [@alexpensify] Link the GH issue for creating/updating the regression test once above steps have been agreed upon:
  18. shubham1206agra commented on Nov 24, 2023

    @shubham1206agra
    Contributor

    One thing I noticed in #15778

    // There is an issue SafeAreaView on Android where wrong insets flicker on app start.
    // Can be removed once https://github.com/th3rdwave/react-native-safe-area-context/issues/364 is resolved.

    This comment got missing somehow. Should we add this back?
    cc @francoisl

  19. shubham1206agra commented on Nov 24, 2023

    @shubham1206agra
    Contributor

    BugZero Checklist: The PR fixing this issue has been merged! The following checklist (instructions) will need to be completed before the issue can be closed:

    • [@shubham1206agra] The PR that introduced the bug has been identified. Link to the PR: Signin rhp #24083
    • [@shubham1206agra] The offending PR has been commented on, pointing out the bug it caused and why, so the author and reviewers can learn from the mistake. Link to comment: Signin rhp #24083 (comment)
    • [@shubham1206agra] A discussion in #expensify-bugs has been started about whether any other steps should be taken (e.g. updating the PR review checklist) in order to catch this type of bug sooner. Link to discussion: NA
    • [@shubham1206agra] Determine if we should create a regression test for this bug. Not needed as this was edge case
    • [@shubham1206agra] If we decide to create a regression test for the bug, please propose the regression test steps to ensure the same bug will not reach production again.
  20. alexpensify commented on Dec 1, 2023

    @alexpensify
    Contributor

    Here is the payment summary:

    • External issue reporter N/A
    • Contributor that fixed the issue @ZhenjaHorbach $500
    • Contributor+ that helped on the issue and/or PR @shubham1206agra $500

    Upwork Job: https://www.upwork.com/jobs/~01cd50fd577deda12f

    *If applicable, the bonuses will be applied on the final payment

    Extra Notes regarding payment: No bonus

  21. alexpensify commented on Dec 1, 2023

    @alexpensify
    Contributor

    Done - everyone has been paid in Upwork!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Labels

Awaiting PaymentAuto-added when associated PR is deployed to productionBugSomething is broken. Auto assigns a BugZero manager.DailyKSv2ExternalAdded to denote the issue can be worked on by a contributor

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions