You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
[HOLD for payment 2024-04-05] [$500] [MEDIUM] Expensify Cards: Wrong report header for the money spent #36186
The solution for this issue has been 🚀 deployed to production 🚀 in version 1.4.57-5 and is now subject to a 7-day regression period 📆. Here is the list of pull requests that resolve this issue:
BugZero Checklist: The PR fixing this issue has been merged! The following checklist (instructions) will need to be completed before the issue can be closed:
[@mollfpr] The PR that introduced the bug has been identified. Link to the PR:
[@mollfpr] The offending PR has been commented on, pointing out the bug it caused and why, so the author and reviewers can learn from the mistake. Link to comment:
[@mollfpr] A discussion in #expensify-bugs has been started about whether any other steps should be taken (e.g. updating the PR review checklist) in order to catch this type of bug sooner. Link to discussion:
[@mollfpr] Determine if we should create a regression test for this bug.
[@mollfpr] If we decide to create a regression test for the bug, please propose the regression test steps to ensure the same bug will not reach production again.
[@CortneyOfstad] Link the GH issue for creating/updating the regression test once above steps have been agreed upon:
[@mollfpr] The PR that introduced the bug has been identified. Link to the PR:
[@mollfpr] The offending PR has been commented on, pointing out the bug it caused and why, so the author and reviewers can learn from the mistake. Link to comment:
Not fully regression from #35529 but we do some improvement and cover another case to show correct verb.
[@mollfpr] A discussion in #expensify-bugs has been started about whether any other steps should be taken (e.g. updating the PR review checklist) in order to catch this type of bug sooner. Link to discussion:
The regression step should be enough.
[@mollfpr] Determine if we should create a regression test for this bug.
[@mollfpr] If we decide to create a regression test for the bug, please propose the regression test steps to ensure the same bug will not reach production again.
Activity
melvin-bot commentedon Feb 8, 2024
Triggered auto assignment to @CortneyOfstad (
Bug), see https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/14418 for more details.CortneyOfstad commentedon Feb 9, 2024
Clarifying which wave here
grgia commentedon Feb 9, 2024
Wave 6 @CortneyOfstad !
grgia commentedon Feb 9, 2024
maybe related to #35529 cc @mollfpr
mollfpr commentedon Feb 9, 2024
Looking 👀
CortneyOfstad commentedon Feb 9, 2024
Wahoo! Thanks @grgia!
grgia commentedon Feb 9, 2024
cc @abzokhattab
86 remaining items
melvin-bot commentedon Mar 29, 2024
Reviewinglabel has been removed, please complete the "BugZero Checklist".melvin-bot commentedon Mar 29, 2024
The solution for this issue has been 🚀 deployed to production 🚀 in version 1.4.57-5 and is now subject to a 7-day regression period 📆. Here is the list of pull requests that resolve this issue:
If no regressions arise, payment will be issued on 2024-04-05. 🎊
For reference, here are some details about the assignees on this issue:
melvin-bot commentedon Mar 29, 2024
BugZero Checklist: The PR fixing this issue has been merged! The following checklist (instructions) will need to be completed before the issue can be closed:
melvin-bot commentedon Apr 3, 2024
If you are the assigned CME please investigate whether the linked PR caused a regression and leave a comment with the results.
If a regression has occurred and you are the assigned CM follow the instructions here.
If this regression could have been avoided please consider also proposing a recommendation to the PR checklist so that we can avoid it in the future.
CortneyOfstad commentedon Apr 3, 2024
@mollfpr Can you complete the checklist before EOD tomorrow? Thanks!
CortneyOfstad commentedon Apr 5, 2024
@mollfpr bump on the checklist 👍
CortneyOfstad commentedon Apr 5, 2024
Payment Summary
@mollfpr to be paid $500 via NewDot
@aimane-chnaif paid $500 via Upwork
mollfpr commentedon Apr 5, 2024
Sorry for the delay @CortneyOfstad
Not fully regression from #35529 but we do some improvement and cover another case to show correct verb.
The regression step should be enough.
mollfpr commentedon Apr 5, 2024
@CortneyOfstad The PR I worked for this issue has a regression but I have fixed it #39208
CortneyOfstad commentedon Apr 5, 2024
@mollfpr I don't see a regression listed. Only that it was merged without testing, which @Gonals handled. We should be good 👍
I think the regression test looks good — @grgia any changes you would like to see made (if any)?
JmillsExpensify commentedon Apr 8, 2024
$500 approved for @mollfpr
CortneyOfstad commentedon Apr 8, 2024
Regression test created here — https://github.com/Expensify/Expensify/issues/386030
Thanks!