You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
[$500] Tag - No search field when there are more than 9 tags in the tag list #36859
Version Number: v1.4.43-0 Reproducible in staging?: Y Reproducible in production?: N Logs:https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/4856 Expensify/Expensify Issue URL: Issue reported by: Applause-Internal Team Slack conversation:
Action Performed:
Precondition:
User is an employee of Collect workspace.
The Collect workspace has more than 9 tags.
Navigate to staging.new.expensify.com
Go to workspace chat.
Click + > Request money > Manual.
Enter amount > Next.
Click Show more.
Click Tag.
Expected Result:
There will be a search field above tag list because there are more than 9 tags.
Actual Result:
There is no search field above tag list when there are more than 9 tags.
Workaround:
Unknown
Platforms:
Which of our officially supported platforms is this issue occurring on?
changed the title [-]Tag - No search field when there are more than 9 tags in the tag list[/-][+][$500] Tag - No search field when there are more than 9 tags in the tag list[/+]on Feb 20, 2024
👋 Friendly reminder that deploy blockers are time-sensitive ⏱ issues! Check out the open `StagingDeployCash` deploy checklist to see the list of PRs included in this release, then work quickly to do one of the following:
Identify the pull request that introduced this issue and revert it.
P.S. Is everyone reading this sure this is really a near-term priority? Be brave: if you disagree, go ahead and close it out. If someone disagrees, they'll reopen it, and if they don't: one less thing to do!
Activity
[-]Tag - No search field when there are more than 9 tags in the tag list[/-][+][$500] Tag - No search field when there are more than 9 tags in the tag list[/+]melvin-bot commentedon Feb 20, 2024
Job added to Upwork: https://www.upwork.com/jobs/~014ce6942105099a0b
melvin-bot commentedon Feb 20, 2024
Triggered auto assignment to @kevinksullivan (
Bug), see https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/14418 for more details.melvin-bot commentedon Feb 20, 2024
Triggered auto assignment to Contributor-plus team member for initial proposal review - @ntdiary (
External)github-actions commentedon Feb 20, 2024
👋 Friendly reminder that deploy blockers are time-sensitive ⏱ issues! Check out the open `StagingDeployCash` deploy checklist to see the list of PRs included in this release, then work quickly to do one of the following:
22 remaining items
Beamanator commentedon Feb 22, 2024
Removing deploy blocker label since fix is now in staging
rezkiy37 commentedon Feb 22, 2024
Yeah, the proposal helped me to fix the bug.
Beamanator commentedon Feb 22, 2024
Noice, then ya i think it does make sense for @tienifr to get some bonus for the help - cc @kevinksullivan , the payment pro in this issue
kevinksullivan commentedon Feb 22, 2024
Just to clarify, @tienifr should be getting paid the same as others for the help, or a fractional "bonus"?
tienifr commentedon Feb 29, 2024
@Beamanator Can you check the question above ^? Thanks
kevinksullivan commentedon Mar 1, 2024
Payout summary:
@tienifr offer sent, let me know when you accept.
tienifr commentedon Mar 2, 2024
@kevinksullivan I accepted, thanks!
JmillsExpensify commentedon Mar 12, 2024
$500 approved for @allroundexperts based on summary.
tienifr commentedon Apr 1, 2024
@kevinksullivan Could you help with payment here? Thanks!
melvin-bot commentedon Apr 5, 2024
This issue has not been updated in over 15 days. @Beamanator, @kevinksullivan, @allroundexperts, @rezkiy37 eroding to Monthly issue.
P.S. Is everyone reading this sure this is really a near-term priority? Be brave: if you disagree, go ahead and close it out. If someone disagrees, they'll reopen it, and if they don't: one less thing to do!
kevinksullivan commentedon Apr 10, 2024
all set