Skip to content

Investigate workflow job failing on main: typecheck / typecheck #37042

Closed

Description

@github-actions

🚨 Failure Summary 🚨:

  • 📋 Job Name: typecheck / typecheck
  • 🔧 Failure in Workflow: Process new code merged to main
  • 🔗 Triggered by PR: PR Link
  • 👤 PR Author: @tienifr
  • 🤝 Merged by: @jasperhuangg
  • 🐛 Error Message:
    warning: Node.js 16 actions are deprecated. Please update the following actions to use Node.js 20: actions/cache@v3. For more information see: https://github.blog/changelog/2023-09-22-github-actions-transitioning-from-node-16-to-node-20/.
    failure: Property 'ListItem' is missing in type '{ shouldPreventDefaultFocusOnSelectRow: true; sections: { data: { text: string; value: "public" | "public_announce" | "private" | "restricted"; alternateText: string; keyForList: "public" | "public_announce" | "private" | "restricted"; isSelected: boolean; }[]; }[]; onSelectRow: (option: { ...; }) => void; initially...' but required in type '{ sections: SectionListData<{ text: string; value: "public" | "public_announce" | "private" | "restricted"; alternateText: string; keyForList: "public" | "public_announce" | "private" | "restricted"; isSelected: boolean; }, Section<...>>[]; ... 34 more ...; onLayout?: ((event: LayoutChangeEvent) => void) | undefined...'.
    failure: Process completed with exit code 2.

⚠️ Action Required ⚠️:

🛠️ A recent merge appears to have caused a failure in the job named typecheck / typecheck.
This issue has been automatically created and labeled with Workflow Failure for investigation.

👀 Please look into the following:

  1. Why the PR caused the job to fail?
  2. Address any underlying issues.

🐛 We appreciate your help in squashing this bug!

Activity

  1. jasperhuangg commented on Feb 21, 2024

    @jasperhuangg
    Contributor

    Reached out to the PR author to fix the type error.

  2. blimpich commented on Feb 21, 2024

    @blimpich
    Contributor

    This should probably be fixed ASAP since it is blocking everyone else's PRs

  3. jasperhuangg commented on Feb 22, 2024

    @jasperhuangg
    Contributor

    @blimpich got it, I'll tackle it myself right now

  4. jasperhuangg commented on Feb 22, 2024

    @jasperhuangg
    Contributor

    This should have been fixed #37063

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions