You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
[HOLD for payment 2024-03-14] [$500] Task - Pointer shows up for an archived task when hovering over the edge of the checkbox #37236
Version Number: 1.4.44.0 Reproducible in staging?: Y Reproducible in production?: N If this was caught during regression testing, add the test name, ID and link from TestRail: Email or phone of affected tester (no customers): Logs:https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/4856 Expensify/Expensify Issue URL: Issue reported by: Applause - Internal Team Slack conversation:
changed the title [-]Task - Pointer shows up for an archived task when hovering over the edge of the checkbox[/-][+][$500] Task - Pointer shows up for an archived task when hovering over the edge of the checkbox[/+]on Feb 26, 2024
👋 Friendly reminder that deploy blockers are time-sensitive ⏱ issues! Check out the open `StagingDeployCash` deploy checklist to see the list of PRs included in this release, then work quickly to do one of the following:
Identify the pull request that introduced this issue and revert it.
The solution for this issue has been 🚀 deployed to production 🚀 in version 1.4.48-0 and is now subject to a 7-day regression period 📆. Here is the list of pull requests that resolve this issue:
BugZero Checklist: The PR fixing this issue has been merged! The following checklist (instructions) will need to be completed before the issue can be closed:
[@ntdiary] The PR that introduced the bug has been identified. Link to the PR:
[@ntdiary] The offending PR has been commented on, pointing out the bug it caused and why, so the author and reviewers can learn from the mistake. Link to comment:
[@ntdiary] A discussion in #expensify-bugs has been started about whether any other steps should be taken (e.g. updating the PR review checklist) in order to catch this type of bug sooner. Link to discussion:
[@ntdiary] Determine if we should create a regression test for this bug.
[@ntdiary] If we decide to create a regression test for the bug, please propose the regression test steps to ensure the same bug will not reach production again.
[@trjExpensify] Link the GH issue for creating/updating the regression test once above steps have been agreed upon:
BugZero Checklist: The PR fixing this issue has been merged! The following checklist (instructions) will need to be completed before the issue can be closed:
[@ntdiary] A discussion in #expensify-bugs has been started about whether any other steps should be taken (e.g. updating the PR review checklist) in order to catch this type of bug sooner. Link to discussion: No need
[@ntdiary] Determine if we should create a regression test for this bug. No need
[@ntdiary] If we decide to create a regression test for the bug, please propose the regression test steps to ensure the same bug will not reach production again. As shown below
[@trjExpensify] Link the GH issue for creating/updating the regression test once above steps have been agreed upon:
Activity
melvin-bot commentedon Feb 26, 2024
Job added to Upwork: https://www.upwork.com/jobs/~0115fb6326c37966b2
[-]Task - Pointer shows up for an archived task when hovering over the edge of the checkbox[/-][+][$500] Task - Pointer shows up for an archived task when hovering over the edge of the checkbox[/+]melvin-bot commentedon Feb 26, 2024
Triggered auto assignment to Contributor-plus team member for initial proposal review - @ntdiary (
External)github-actions commentedon Feb 26, 2024
👋 Friendly reminder that deploy blockers are time-sensitive ⏱ issues! Check out the open `StagingDeployCash` deploy checklist to see the list of PRs included in this release, then work quickly to do one of the following:
melvin-bot commentedon Feb 26, 2024
Triggered auto assignment to @jasperhuangg (
Engineering), see https://stackoverflowteams.com/c/expensify/questions/9980/ for more details.lanitochka17 commentedon Feb 26, 2024
We think that this bug might be related to #vip-vsp
CC @quinthar
34 remaining items
melvin-bot commentedon Mar 7, 2024
Reviewinglabel has been removed, please complete the "BugZero Checklist".melvin-bot commentedon Mar 7, 2024
The solution for this issue has been 🚀 deployed to production 🚀 in version 1.4.48-0 and is now subject to a 7-day regression period 📆. Here is the list of pull requests that resolve this issue:
If no regressions arise, payment will be issued on 2024-03-14. 🎊
For reference, here are some details about the assignees on this issue:
melvin-bot commentedon Mar 7, 2024
BugZero Checklist: The PR fixing this issue has been merged! The following checklist (instructions) will need to be completed before the issue can be closed:
trjExpensify commentedon Mar 14, 2024
👋 @ntdiary checklist time! :)
ntdiary commentedon Mar 15, 2024
@trjExpensify, ah, time flies. 😂 BTW, I'm still waiting to switch to NewDot for the payments. 😄
trjExpensify commentedon Mar 15, 2024
Haha, that it does! 🕐 Cool, I've asked Matt for an update on that quickly. If not, I can pay you via Upwork.
In the meantime.. I don't think it's worth having a regression test for this pointer cursor. 👍 Payment summary as follows:
$500 to @ntdiary for the C+ review
$500 to @Krishna2323 for the fix
Krishna2323 commentedon Mar 18, 2024
@trjExpensify any updates here?
trjExpensify commentedon Mar 18, 2024
Yep, we're proceeding with Upwork for now.
@Krishna2323 - paid
@ntdiary - waiting for you to accept the offer. :)
ntdiary commentedon Mar 18, 2024
@trjExpensify, ah, sorry, just accepted. 😂
trjExpensify commentedon Mar 18, 2024
Perfect, paid. Closing! 👍