Skip to content

[HOLD for payment 2024-05-06] [HOLD for payment 2024-05-03] [Wave Collect][QBO] Fix the command name #41001

Closed

Description

@hayata-suenaga

Fix the API command name from UpdatePolicyConnectionConfig to UpdatePolicyConnectionConfiguration

Activity

  1. added
    BugSomething is broken. Auto assigns a BugZero manager.
    on Apr 25, 2024
  2. moved this to Release 1: Spring 2024 (May) in [#whatsnext] #wave-collecton Apr 25, 2024
  3. melvin-bot commented on Apr 25, 2024

    @melvin-bot

    Triggered auto assignment to @JmillsExpensify (Bug), see https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/14418 for more details. Please add this bug to a GH project, as outlined in the SO.

  4. added
    ReviewingHas a PR in review
    Awaiting PaymentAuto-added when associated PR is deployed to production
    and removed on Apr 25, 2024
  5. changed the title [-][Wave Collect][QBO] Fix the command name[/-] [+][HOLD for payment 2024-05-03] [Wave Collect][QBO] Fix the command name[/+] on Apr 26, 2024
  6. 2 remaining items

  7. melvin-bot commented on Apr 26, 2024

    @melvin-bot

    BugZero Checklist: The PR fixing this issue has been merged! The following checklist (instructions) will need to be completed before the issue can be closed:

    • [@hayata-suenaga] The PR that introduced the bug has been identified. Link to the PR:
    • [@hayata-suenaga] The offending PR has been commented on, pointing out the bug it caused and why, so the author and reviewers can learn from the mistake. Link to comment:
    • [@hayata-suenaga] A discussion in #expensify-bugs has been started about whether any other steps should be taken (e.g. updating the PR review checklist) in order to catch this type of bug sooner. Link to discussion:
    • [@hayata-suenaga] Determine if we should create a regression test for this bug.
    • [@hayata-suenaga] If we decide to create a regression test for the bug, please propose the regression test steps to ensure the same bug will not reach production again.
    • [@JmillsExpensify] Link the GH issue for creating/updating the regression test once above steps have been agreed upon:
  8. hayata-suenaga commented on Apr 29, 2024

    @hayata-suenaga
    ContributorAuthor

    The regression was caused by the PR worked by one of the expert agency engineers. We don't need regression tests for this.

  9. changed the title [-][HOLD for payment 2024-05-03] [Wave Collect][QBO] Fix the command name[/-] [+][HOLD for payment 2024-05-06] [HOLD for payment 2024-05-03] [Wave Collect][QBO] Fix the command name[/+] on Apr 29, 2024
  10. melvin-bot commented on Apr 29, 2024

    @melvin-bot

    The solution for this issue has been 🚀 deployed to production 🚀 in version 1.4.67-7 and is now subject to a 7-day regression period 📆. Here is the list of pull requests that resolve this issue:

    If no regressions arise, payment will be issued on 2024-05-06. 🎊

  11. melvin-bot commented on Apr 29, 2024

    @melvin-bot

    BugZero Checklist: The PR fixing this issue has been merged! The following checklist (instructions) will need to be completed before the issue can be closed:

    • [@hayata-suenaga] The PR that introduced the bug has been identified. Link to the PR:
    • [@hayata-suenaga] The offending PR has been commented on, pointing out the bug it caused and why, so the author and reviewers can learn from the mistake. Link to comment:
    • [@hayata-suenaga] A discussion in #expensify-bugs has been started about whether any other steps should be taken (e.g. updating the PR review checklist) in order to catch this type of bug sooner. Link to discussion:
    • [@hayata-suenaga] Determine if we should create a regression test for this bug.
    • [@hayata-suenaga] If we decide to create a regression test for the bug, please propose the regression test steps to ensure the same bug will not reach production again.
    • [@JmillsExpensify] Link the GH issue for creating/updating the regression test once above steps have been agreed upon:
  12. hayata-suenaga commented on Apr 30, 2024

    @hayata-suenaga
    ContributorAuthor

    Melvin, you crated the checklist twice 😓

  13. hayata-suenaga commented on May 6, 2024

    @hayata-suenaga
    ContributorAuthor

    The PR was deployed to production and there is no payment needed for this issue. Closing this 🙇

  14. moved this from Release 1: Spring 2024 (May) to Done in [#whatsnext] #wave-collecton May 6, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Labels

Awaiting PaymentAuto-added when associated PR is deployed to productionBugSomething is broken. Auto assigns a BugZero manager.DailyKSv2

Type

No type

Projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions