Skip to content

Expense - Logo in Share code for transaction thread is not Expensify logo #45827

Closed

Description

@lanitochka17

If you haven’t already, check out our contributing guidelines for onboarding and email contributors@expensify.com to request to join our Slack channel!


Version Number: 9.0.10-2
Reproducible in staging?: Y
Reproducible in production?: N
If this was caught during regression testing, add the test name, ID and link from TestRail: N/A
Issue reported by: Applause - Internal Team

Issue found when executing PR #39072

Action Performed:

  1. Go to staging.new.expensify.com
  2. Go to DM with no unsettled expense
  3. Submit an expense
  4. Click on the expense preview
  5. Click report header > Share
  6. Note that the logo in share code is Expensify logo
  7. Create another expense
  8. Go to transaction thread
  9. Click report header > Share

Expected Result:

Logo in Share code for transaction thread is Expensify logo

Actual Result:

Logo in Share code for transaction thread is not Expensify logo, It follows the individual policy avatar

Workaround:

Unknown

Platforms:

Which of our officially supported platforms is this issue occurring on?

  • Android: Native
  • Android: mWeb Chrome
  • iOS: Native
  • iOS: mWeb Safari
  • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • MacOS: Desktop

Screenshots/Videos

Add any screenshot/video evidence

Bug6547689_1721434920584.20240720_081735.mp4

View all open jobs on GitHub

Activity

  1. added
    DeployBlockerCashThis issue or pull request should block deployment
    DeployBlockerIndicates it should block deploying the API
    on Jul 20, 2024
  2. github-actions commented on Jul 20, 2024

    @github-actions
    Contributor

    👋 Friendly reminder that deploy blockers are time-sensitive ⏱ issues! Check out the open `StagingDeployCash` deploy checklist to see the list of PRs included in this release, then work quickly to do one of the following:

    1. Identify the pull request that introduced this issue and revert it.
    2. Find someone who can quickly fix the issue.
    3. Fix the issue yourself.
  3. melvin-bot commented on Jul 20, 2024

    @melvin-bot

    Triggered auto assignment to @rlinoz (DeployBlockerCash), see https://stackoverflowteams.com/c/expensify/questions/9980/ for more details.

  4. mountiny commented on Jul 21, 2024

    @mountiny
    Contributor

    @Kicu @grgia @blazejkustra @luacmartins @sobitneupane Seems like this might be coming from your PR #39072 can you have a look please?

    Ultimately I think this could be demoted as its a minor UI issue that does not block the user

  5. Kicu commented on Jul 22, 2024

    @Kicu
    Contributor

    Hey thanks for calling us. Yes this is definitely coming from my PR #39072

    However you can take a look at this comment from @shawnborton #39072 (comment)

    He suggested we move forward with switching the current expectation of using expensify logo to using the same logo as in header.
    Now the app is not yet 100% ready to do this (we need 1 more PR) but there are parts of the app that will already show the avatar, so I think this should be deemed a not bug.
    Please comment on this @shawnborton

  6. shawnborton commented on Jul 22, 2024

    @shawnborton
    Contributor

    Correct, this is not a bug - we want to move towards a world where the avatar found in the share code always matches either the user's avatar, the workspace avatar, or the avatar found in the chat header. I can close this out, this is not a deploy blocker.

  7. shawnborton commented on Jul 22, 2024

    @shawnborton
    Contributor

    @Kicu what are next steps to make this work everywhere though? Do we have that spelled out anywhere, and do we need a new issue to track this? Happy to make one if so, just let me know!

  8. Kicu commented on Jul 22, 2024

    @Kicu
    Contributor

    I believe the main thing I need is a new issue defined be someone so that I can get assigned to it.
    I don't think I need any detailed definition other than "make the avatar inside QR code the same as in header".

    The issue would also be a place to discuss any edge cases that might arise while doing that (I'm not yet sure simple this task will be, probably simple-to-mid-complex).

  9. shawnborton commented on Jul 22, 2024

    @shawnborton
    Contributor

    Sounds good, I'll make the new issue now.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions