Skip to content

[PAID] [CRITICAL] [Advanced Approval Workflows] Implement <WorkspaceWorkflowsApprovalsExpensesFromPage /> for Member Selection #45955

Closed

Description

@tgolen

Coming from: #wave-control: advanced approval + workflows polish

Issue OwnerCurrent Issue Owner: @blazejkustra

Activity

  1. self-assigned this
    on Jul 22, 2024
  2. blazejkustra commented on Jul 23, 2024

    @blazejkustra
    Contributor

    Hey! I’m Błażej Kustra from Software Mansion, an expert agency, and I’d like to work on this issue!

  3. melvin-bot commented on Jul 26, 2024

    @melvin-bot

    @tgolen, @blazejkustra Uh oh! This issue is overdue by 2 days. Don't forget to update your issues!

  4. 27 remaining items

  5. strepanier03 commented on Aug 19, 2024

    @strepanier03
    Contributor

    Scratch that, you come up under a different last initial but I found you now, all good.

  6. strepanier03 commented on Aug 19, 2024

    @strepanier03
    Contributor

    Offer sent, I'll check again in a couple hours to see if I can pay it.

  7. suneox commented on Aug 19, 2024

    @suneox
    Contributor

    Offer sent, I'll check again in a couple hours to see if I can pay it.

    @strepanier03 Thank you, I have accepted an offer

  8. melvin-bot commented on Aug 19, 2024

    @melvin-bot

    @tgolen, @strepanier03, @suneox, @blazejkustra Uh oh! This issue is overdue by 2 days. Don't forget to update your issues!

  9. strepanier03 commented on Aug 19, 2024

    @strepanier03
    Contributor

    Thanks @suneox, I've paid it and closed the contract.

  10. changed the title [-][HOLD for payment 2024-08-14] [HOLD for payment 2024-08-09] [CRITICAL] [Advanced Approval Workflows] Implement `<WorkspaceWorkflowsApprovalsExpensesFromPage />` for Member Selection[/-] [+][PAID] [CRITICAL] [Advanced Approval Workflows] Implement `<WorkspaceWorkflowsApprovalsExpensesFromPage />` for Member Selection[/+] on Aug 19, 2024
  11. melvin-bot commented on Aug 27, 2024

    @melvin-bot

    ⚠️ Looks like this issue was linked to a Deploy Blocker here

    If you are the assigned CME please investigate whether the linked PR caused a regression and leave a comment with the results.

    If a regression has occurred and you are the assigned CM follow the instructions here.

    If this regression could have been avoided please consider also proposing a recommendation to the PR checklist so that we can avoid it in the future.

  12. strepanier03 commented on Apr 16, 2025

    @strepanier03
    Contributor

    Aaah, looks like there were two PRs and two C+ who needed payment.

    @thesahindia was the C+ who reviewed #46484 and @suneox reviewed #46510.

    I'll handle the payment for @thesahindia now and post a payment summary.

  13. thesahindia commented on Apr 16, 2025

    @thesahindia
    Member

    I'll handle the payment for @thesahindia now and post a payment summary.

    I will be sending a request on ND. I will just need the payment summary.

  14. strepanier03 commented on Apr 16, 2025

    @strepanier03
    Contributor

    Payment Summary

    Context: There were two PRs tied to this GH and we only paid the C+ for one of them. More context here.

  15. garrettmknight commented on Apr 22, 2025

    @garrettmknight
    Contributor

    $250 approved for @thesahindia

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Labels

Awaiting PaymentAuto-added when associated PR is deployed to productionBugSomething is broken. Auto assigns a BugZero manager.DailyKSv2EngineeringTask

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions