You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
[HOLD for payment 2024-11-20] [$125] Add Type column to Expensify Card workspace feeds #51847
Problem: We're getting feedback from real customers using workspace feeds, specifically that they get confused what type of card someone has been issued. This is important to solve on NewDot because we've de-coupled the issuance of physical cards from virtual cards; each can be assigned individually, and at separate times.
Solution: Let's add a Type column to the Expensify Cards page in the workspace editor on larger (web) screens. Then given the smaller screen real estate on mobile, let's use the "dot separator" pattern for smaller (mobile) screens.
For the sake of clarity:
The only acceptable types are Physical or Virtual
On web, the Type columns appears to the left Last 4 column
On mobile, the Type appear after the * dot separator behind the card name. If no card name exists (is this possible?), then we only show the type.
The end result looks like this.
Assigning @DylanDylann directly since he's working on this project.
The solution for this issue has been 🚀 deployed to production 🚀 in version 9.0.60-3 and is now subject to a 7-day regression period 📆. Here is the list of pull requests that resolve this issue:
@DylanDylann@JmillsExpensify@DylanDylann The PR fixing this issue has been merged! The following checklist (instructions) will need to be completed before the issue can be closed. Please copy/paste the BugZero Checklist from here into a new comment on this GH and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]
changed the title [-][HOLD for payment 2024-11-20] [$125] Add `Type` column to workspace feeds[/-][+][HOLD for payment 2024-11-20] [$125] Add `Type` column to Expensify Card workspace feeds[/+]on Nov 20, 2024
1a. Result of the original design (eg. a case wasn't considered)
1b. Mistake during implementation
1c. Backend bug
1z. Other:
Where bug was reported:
2a. Reported on production
2b. Reported on staging (deploy blocker)
2c. Reported on both staging and production
2d. Reported on a PR
2z. Other:
Who reported the bug:
3a. Expensify user
3b. Expensify employee
3c. Contributor
3d. QA
3z. Other:
[Contributor] The offending PR has been commented on, pointing out the bug it caused and why, so the author and reviewers can learn from the mistake.
Link to comment: NA. This is a new design
[Contributor] If the regression was CRITICAL (e.g. interrupts a core flow) A discussion in #expensify-open-source has been started about whether any other steps should be taken (e.g. updating the PR review checklist) in order to catch this type of bug sooner.
Link to discussion:
[Contributor] If it was decided to create a regression test for the bug, please propose the regression test steps using the template below to ensure the same bug will not reach production again.
[BugZero Assignee] Create a GH issue for creating/updating the regression test once above steps have been agreed upon.
Link to issue:
Regression Test Proposal
Test:
Go to workspace with Expensify card enabled
Create a card
Verify that: we have Type column on large screen and a type row on the small screen (below the limit amount)
Activity
melvin-bot commentedon Nov 1, 2024
Current assignee @JmillsExpensify is eligible for the Bug assigner, not assigning anyone new.
[-]Add `Type` column to workspace feeds[/-][+][$250] Add `Type` column to workspace feeds[/+]melvin-bot commentedon Nov 1, 2024
Job added to Upwork: https://www.upwork.com/jobs/~021852303870715636589
melvin-bot commentedon Nov 1, 2024
Current assignee @DylanDylann is eligible for the External assigner, not assigning anyone new.
[-][$250] Add `Type` column to workspace feeds[/-][+][$125] Add `Type` column to workspace feeds[/+]melvin-bot commentedon Nov 1, 2024
Upwork job price has been updated to $125
nkdengineer commentedon Nov 1, 2024
Edited by proposal-police: This proposal was edited at 2024-11-01 11:06:46 UTC.
Proposal
Please re-state the problem that we are trying to solve in this issue.
What is the root cause of that problem?
new feature
What changes do you think we should make in order to solve the problem?
WorkspaceCardListRowcomponentWorkspaceCardListHeaderApp/src/pages/workspace/expensifyCard/WorkspaceCardListRow.tsx
Line 57 in e597ded
What alternative solutions did you explore? (Optional)
NA
nkdengineer commentedon Nov 1, 2024
updated proposal to handle case in small screen and add the result
19 remaining items
melvin-bot commentedon Nov 13, 2024
The solution for this issue has been 🚀 deployed to production 🚀 in version 9.0.60-3 and is now subject to a 7-day regression period 📆. Here is the list of pull requests that resolve this issue:
If no regressions arise, payment will be issued on 2024-11-20. 🎊
For reference, here are some details about the assignees on this issue:
melvin-bot commentedon Nov 13, 2024
@DylanDylann @JmillsExpensify @DylanDylann The PR fixing this issue has been merged! The following checklist (instructions) will need to be completed before the issue can be closed. Please copy/paste the BugZero Checklist from here into a new comment on this GH and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]
DylanDylann commentedon Nov 19, 2024
I will complete the checklist after some style issues are resolved then I can make a regression test completely
[-][HOLD for payment 2024-11-20] [$125] Add `Type` column to workspace feeds[/-][+][HOLD for payment 2024-11-20] [$125] Add `Type` column to Expensify Card workspace feeds[/+]JmillsExpensify commentedon Nov 20, 2024
Payment summary:
JmillsExpensify commentedon Nov 20, 2024
Upwork offers sent.
DylanDylann commentedon Nov 25, 2024
BugZero Checklist:
Bug classification
Source of bug:
Where bug was reported:
Who reported the bug:
[Contributor] The offending PR has been commented on, pointing out the bug it caused and why, so the author and reviewers can learn from the mistake.
Link to comment: NA. This is a new design
[Contributor] If the regression was CRITICAL (e.g. interrupts a core flow) A discussion in #expensify-open-source has been started about whether any other steps should be taken (e.g. updating the PR review checklist) in order to catch this type of bug sooner.
Link to discussion:
[Contributor] If it was decided to create a regression test for the bug, please propose the regression test steps using the template below to ensure the same bug will not reach production again.
[BugZero Assignee] Create a GH issue for creating/updating the regression test once above steps have been agreed upon.
Link to issue:
Regression Test Proposal
Test:
Do we agree 👍 or 👎
JmillsExpensify commentedon Nov 25, 2024
@nkdengineer please accept the Upwork offer when you get a chance.
nkdengineer commentedon Nov 25, 2024
@JmillsExpensify I accepted, thanks.
JmillsExpensify commentedon Nov 27, 2024
Awesome. All contributors paid out and regression test created.