Skip to content

[HOLD for payment 2024-11-29] Not able to submit expense to Expenses - Expensify CA workspace #52515

Closed

Description

@m-natarajan

If you haven’t already, check out our contributing guidelines for onboarding and email contributors@expensify.com to request to join our Slack channel!


Version Number:
Reproducible in staging?: needs reproduction
Reproducible in production?: needs reproduction
If this was caught on HybridApp, is this reproducible on New Expensify Standalone?:
If this was caught during regression testing, add the test name, ID and link from TestRail:
Email or phone of affected tester (no customers):
Logs: https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/4856
Expensify/Expensify Issue URL:
Issue reported by: @justinpersaud
Slack conversation (hyperlinked to channel name): expensify_migrate

Action Performed:

  1. Go to Expenses - Expensify CA workspace.
  2. Click on + sign
  3. Click global create
  4. Submit expense
  5. Enter amount
  6. Select the workspace Expenses - Expensify CA workspace
  7. Submit the expense

Expected Result:

  • in step 2 "submit expense" should be available
  • Expense should be available in the workspace after created

Actual Result:

  • in step 2 "submit expense" is not available
  • Expense disappears in the workspace after created

Workaround:

unknown

Platforms:

Which of our officially supported platforms is this issue occurring on?

  • Android: Standalone
  • Android: HybridApp
  • Android: mWeb Chrome
  • iOS: Standalone
  • iOS: HybridApp
  • iOS: mWeb Safari
  • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • MacOS: Desktop

Screenshots/Videos

Add any screenshot/video evidence

View all open jobs on GitHub

Issue OwnerCurrent Issue Owner: @kadiealexander

Activity

  1. added
    BugSomething is broken. Auto assigns a BugZero manager.
    on Nov 14, 2024
  2. melvin-bot commented on Nov 14, 2024

    @melvin-bot

    Triggered auto assignment to @kadiealexander (Bug), see https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/14418 for more details. Please add this bug to a GH project, as outlined in the SO.

  3. MelvinBot commented on Nov 14, 2024

    @MelvinBot
    Contributor

    This has been labelled "Needs Reproduction". Follow the steps here: https://stackoverflowteams.com/c/expensify/questions/16989

  4. kadiealexander commented on Nov 14, 2024

    @kadiealexander
    Contributor

    I'm not able to reproduce this (I'm not in the CA workspace and I can't repro with the AU workspace) - @aldo-expensify or @luacmartins would either of you be able to try reproduce this for us?

  5. luacmartins commented on Nov 14, 2024

    @luacmartins
    Contributor

    Yea, I don't have the submit option from within the workspace chat.

  6. added
    InternalRequires API changes or must be handled by Expensify staff
    and removed on Nov 18, 2024
  7. kadiealexander commented on Nov 18, 2024

    @kadiealexander
    Contributor

    Not overdue!

  8. 9 remaining items

  9. mountiny commented on Nov 19, 2024

    @mountiny
    Contributor

    PR up

  10. added
    Awaiting PaymentAuto-added when associated PR is deployed to production
    and removed on Nov 22, 2024
  11. changed the title [-]Not able to submit expense to `Expenses - Expensify CA` workspace[/-] [+][HOLD for payment 2024-11-29] Not able to submit expense to `Expenses - Expensify CA` workspace[/+] on Nov 22, 2024
  12. melvin-bot commented on Nov 22, 2024

    @melvin-bot

    Reviewing label has been removed, please complete the "BugZero Checklist".

  13. melvin-bot commented on Nov 22, 2024

    @melvin-bot

    The solution for this issue has been 🚀 deployed to production 🚀 in version 9.0.65-5 and is now subject to a 7-day regression period 📆. Here is the list of pull requests that resolve this issue:

    If no regressions arise, payment will be issued on 2024-11-29. 🎊

  14. melvin-bot commented on Nov 22, 2024

    @melvin-bot

    @mountiny @kadiealexander @mountiny The PR fixing this issue has been merged! The following checklist (instructions) will need to be completed before the issue can be closed. Please copy/paste the BugZero Checklist from here into a new comment on this GH and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

  15. heyjennahay commented on Nov 27, 2024

    @heyjennahay
    Contributor

    Confirming this issue has been resolved for me

  16. mountiny commented on Nov 28, 2024

    @mountiny
    Contributor

    BugZero Checklist:

    • [Contributor] Classify the bug:
    Bug classification

    Source of bug:

    • 1a. Result of the original design (eg. a case wasn't considered)
    • 1b. Mistake during implementation
    • 1c. Backend bug
    • 1z. Other:

    Where bug was reported:

    • 2a. Reported on production
    • 2b. Reported on staging (deploy blocker)
    • 2c. Reported on both staging and production
    • 2d. Reported on a PR
    • 2z. Other:

    Who reported the bug:

    • 3a. Expensify user
    • 3b. Expensify employee
    • 3c. Contributor
    • 3d. QA
    • 3z. Other:
    • [Contributor] The offending PR has been commented on, pointing out the bug it caused and why, so the author and reviewers can learn from the mistake.

      Link to comment: This is a migration issue and new expensify account was not whilabelled as participant

    • [Contributor] If the regression was CRITICAL (e.g. interrupts a core flow) A discussion in #expensify-open-source has been started about whether any other steps should be taken (e.g. updating the PR review checklist) in order to catch this type of bug sooner.

      Link to discussion: This already started in Slack

    • [Contributor] If it was decided to create a regression test for the bug, please propose the regression test steps using the template below to ensure the same bug will not reach production again.

    Regression Test Proposal Template
    • [BugZero Assignee] Create a GH issue for creating/updating the regression test once above steps have been agreed upon.

      Link to issue: No need

    Regression Test Proposal

    Precondition:

    Test:

    Do we agree 👍 or 👎

  17. moved this from First Cohort - CRITICAL to Done in [#whatsnext] #migrateon Nov 28, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Labels

Awaiting PaymentAuto-added when associated PR is deployed to productionBugSomething is broken. Auto assigns a BugZero manager.Hot PickReady for an engineer to pick up and run withInternalRequires API changes or must be handled by Expensify staffWeeklyKSv2

Type

No type

Projects

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions