You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
[Due for payment 2025-03-17] Add feed syntax key #56855
When users select a card feed, we currently select all cards in the feed and use the card: syntax key with those cardIDs. That's worked so far, but it creates an issue where saving this search will save a static list of cardIDs and won't reflect any cards added/removed from the feed.
Why is this important?
Feature should handle a dynamic list of cards
Solution
Keep the UI the same, but use a feed syntax key in search that'll pass the fundID to the backend
@luacmartins - since you removed the BUG label, i don't think I'm needed on this issue so I'm going to unassign myself. if im misinterpreting, just lmk!
📣 @JakubKorytko! 📣
Hey, it seems we don’t have your contributor details yet! You'll only have to do this once, and this is how we'll hire you on Upwork.
Please follow these steps:
Get the email address used to login to your Expensify account. If you don't already have an Expensify account, create one here. If you have multiple accounts (e.g. one for testing), please use your main account email.
Get the link to your Upwork profile. It's necessary because we only pay via Upwork. You can access it by logging in, and then clicking on your name. It'll look like this. If you don't already have an account, sign up for one here.
Copy the format below and paste it in a comment on this issue. Replace the placeholder text with your actual details.
Format:
Contributor details
Your Expensify account email: <REPLACE EMAIL HERE>
Upwork Profile Link: <REPLACE LINK HERE>
Activity
melvin-bot commentedon Feb 13, 2025
Triggered auto assignment to @maddylewis (
Bug), see https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/14418 for more details. Please add this bug to a GH project, as outlined in the SO.maddylewis commentedon Feb 14, 2025
@luacmartins - since you removed the
BUGlabel, i don't think I'm needed on this issue so I'm going to unassign myself. if im misinterpreting, just lmk!JakubKorytko commentedon Feb 17, 2025
Hello my name is Jakub and I work for SWM expert agency. I would like to work on this task, please assign me.
melvin-bot commentedon Feb 17, 2025
📣 @JakubKorytko! 📣
Hey, it seems we don’t have your contributor details yet! You'll only have to do this once, and this is how we'll hire you on Upwork.
Please follow these steps:
Format:
[-]Add `fund` syntax key[/-][+]Add `feed` syntax key[/+]42 remaining items
luacmartins commentedon Mar 17, 2025
Reassigning @maddylewis for payment based on this comment #56855 (comment)
maddylewis commentedon Mar 18, 2025
on it!
maddylewis commentedon Mar 18, 2025
Payment Overview
maddylewis commentedon Mar 18, 2025
@sobitneupane - are you due payment for this issue? if yes, can you confirm the payment amount? ty!
sobitneupane commentedon Mar 19, 2025
@maddylewis Yes, I believe it's the usual $250.
maddylewis commentedon Mar 19, 2025
sobitneupane commentedon Mar 20, 2025
@maddylewis I don’t think we need a checklist here. This is an improvement to an existing feature rather than a bug.
sobitneupane commentedon Mar 20, 2025
Regression Test Proposal:
Do we agree 👍 or 👎
maddylewis commentedon Mar 20, 2025
@luacmartins - does this regression test proposal sound good? #56855 (comment)
luacmartins commentedon Mar 20, 2025
Yea, that's good
maddylewis commentedon Mar 21, 2025
closing!
garrettmknight commentedon May 20, 2025
$250 approved for @sobitneupane