Repository navigation
[Due for payment 2025-05-27] [$250] android-workflow-Unable to delete approval workflow #61986
Description
If you haven’t already, check out our contributing guidelines for onboarding and email contributors@expensify.com to request to join our Slack channel!
Version Number: V9.1.45-0
Reproducible in staging?: Yes
Reproducible in production?: No
If this was caught during regression testing, add the test name, ID and link from TestRail: https://expensify.testrail.io/index.php?/tests/view/6097474
Email or phone of affected tester (no customers): Slottwo1 bi1@gmail.com
Issue reported by: Applause Internal Team
Device used: Redminote note 10s android 13
App Component: Workspace Settings
Action Performed:
- Launch app
- Go to workspace settings - members
- Invite 3 members
- Open workflow - tap on additional approver - upgrade
- Add additional approver ( user A) - click save
- Tap add approval workflow
- Select (user B) as expense from and send to this member & complete the flow.
- Open the flow - delete
Expected Result:
Add approval workflow must get deleted on tapping delete.
Actual Result:
Add approval workflow not deleted on tapping delete.
Workaround:
Unknown
Platforms:
- Android: App
- Android: mWeb Chrome
- iOS: App
- iOS: mWeb Safari
- iOS: mWeb Chrome
- Windows: Chrome
- MacOS: Chrome / Safari
- MacOS: Desktop
Screenshots/Videos
Bug6830254_1747172525761.Screenrecorder-2025-05-14-03-00-26-332.mp4
Upwork Automation - Do Not Edit
- Upwork Job URL: https://www.upwork.com/jobs/~021922597876858234035
- Upwork Job ID: 1922597876858234035
- Last Price Increase: 2025-05-14
- Automatic offers:
- nkdengineer | Contributor | 107302995
Activity
github-actions commentedon May 14, 2025
👋 Friendly reminder that deploy blockers are time-sensitive ⏱ issues! Check out the open `StagingDeployCash` deploy checklist to see the list of PRs included in this release, then work quickly to do one of the following:
melvin-bot commentedon May 14, 2025
Triggered auto assignment to @techievivek (
DeployBlockerCash), see https://stackoverflowteams.com/c/expensify/questions/9980/ for more details.melvin-bot commentedon May 14, 2025
Triggered auto assignment to @muttmuure (
Bug), see https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/14418 for more details. Please add this bug to a GH project, as outlined in the SO.melvin-bot commentedon May 14, 2025
💬 A slack conversation has been started in #expensify-open-source
41 remaining items
[-][$250] android-workflow-Unable to delete approval workflow[/-][+][Due for payment 2025-05-27] [$250] android-workflow-Unable to delete approval workflow[/+]melvin-bot commentedon May 20, 2025
Reviewinglabel has been removed, please complete the "BugZero Checklist".melvin-bot commentedon May 20, 2025
The solution for this issue has been 🚀 deployed to production 🚀 in version 9.1.46-12 and is now subject to a 7-day regression period 📆. Here is the list of pull requests that resolve this issue:
If no regressions arise, payment will be issued on 2025-05-27. 🎊
For reference, here are some details about the assignees on this issue:
melvin-bot commentedon May 20, 2025
@ahmedGaber93 @muttmuure @ahmedGaber93 The PR fixing this issue has been merged! The following checklist (instructions) will need to be completed before the issue can be closed. Please copy/paste the BugZero Checklist from here into a new comment on this GH and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]
ahmedGaber93 commentedon May 27, 2025
BugZero Checklist:
Bug classification
Source of bug:
Where bug was reported:
Who reported the bug:
[Contributor] The offending PR has been commented on, pointing out the bug it caused and why, so the author and reviewers can learn from the mistake.
Link to comment: https://github.com/Expensify/App/pull/57536/files#r2110289028
[Contributor] If the regression was CRITICAL (e.g. interrupts a core flow) A discussion in #expensify-open-source has been started about whether any other steps should be taken (e.g. updating the PR review checklist) in order to catch this type of bug sooner.
Link to discussion: N/A.
[Contributor] If it was decided to create a regression test for the bug, please propose the regression test steps using the template below to ensure the same bug will not reach production again.
Base on OP, there is already a test in TestRail for this case.
muttmuure commentedon May 30, 2025
@ahmedGaber93 - $250 C+
@nkdengineer - $250 C
JmillsExpensify commentedon Jul 11, 2025
$250 approved for @ahmedGaber93