Skip to content

Hold expense - Unable to hold expense via checkbox if the expense thread is not opened first #63502

Closed

Description

@mitarachim

If you haven’t already, check out our contributing guidelines for onboarding and email contributors@expensify.com to request to join our Slack channel!


Version Number: 9.1.59-0
Reproducible in staging?: Yes
Reproducible in production?: No
If this was caught during regression testing, add the test name, ID and link from TestRail: https://expensify.testrail.io/index.php?/tests/view/6206790
Email or phone of affected tester (no customers): sdjosdinjsdodinsj@gmail.com
Issue reported by: Applause Internal Team
Device used: Mac 15.4 / Chrome
App Component: Money Requests

Action Performed:

  1. Go to staging.new.expensify.com
  2. Create a workspace.
  3. Go to workspace chat.
  4. Submit two expenses.
  5. Click on the expense preview to go to expense report.
  6. Do not open any expense.
  7. Select any expense via checkbox.
  8. Click More > Hold.
  9. Enter reason and save it.
  10. The expense is still not held.
  11. Click on the same expense row then close it.
  12. Click More > Hold.
  13. Enter reason and save it.
  14. Now the expense is held, only after the expense is opened.

Expected Result:

In Step 10, the expense will be held via checkbox and More option when the expense thread is not opened previously.

Actual Result:

In Step 10, the expense cannot be held via checkbox and More option when the expense thread is not opened previously.
In Step 14, the expense can only be held after the expense thread is opened at least once.

Workaround:

Unknown

Platforms:

  • Android: App
  • Android: mWeb Chrome
  • iOS: App
  • iOS: mWeb Safari
  • iOS: mWeb Chrome
  • Windows: Chrome
  • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • MacOS: Desktop

Screenshots/Videos

Bug6850975_1749073662390.20250605_054327.mp4

View all open jobs on GitHub

Activity

  1. added
    DeployBlockerCashThis issue or pull request should block deployment
    BugSomething is broken. Auto assigns a BugZero manager.
    DeployBlockerIndicates it should block deploying the API
    on Jun 4, 2025
  2. melvin-bot commented on Jun 4, 2025

    @melvin-bot

    Triggered auto assignment to @bfitzexpensify (Bug), see https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/14418 for more details. Please add this bug to a GH project, as outlined in the SO.

  3. melvin-bot commented on Jun 4, 2025

    @melvin-bot

    Triggered auto assignment to @francoisl (DeployBlockerCash), see https://stackoverflowteams.com/c/expensify/questions/9980/ for more details.

  4. melvin-bot commented on Jun 4, 2025

    @melvin-bot

    💬 A slack conversation has been started in #expensify-open-source

  5. github-actions commented on Jun 4, 2025

    @github-actions
    Contributor

    👋 Friendly reminder that deploy blockers are time-sensitive ⏱ issues! Check out the open `StagingDeployCash` deploy checklist to see the list of PRs included in this release, then work quickly to do one of the following:

    1. Identify the pull request that introduced this issue and revert it.
    2. Find someone who can quickly fix the issue.
    3. Fix the issue yourself.
  6. BlameGPT commented on Jun 4, 2025

    @BlameGPT
    Contributor

    Possible culprit PRs for this issue

  7. samranahm commented on Jun 4, 2025

    @samranahm
    Contributor

    Unable to produce on latest main

  8. francoisl commented on Jun 4, 2025

    @francoisl
    Contributor

    Same here, it's working fine on main but I can repro locally on the tag 9.1.59-0-staging. Something probably got merged recently that fixes this.

  9. francoisl commented on Jun 4, 2025

    @francoisl
    Contributor

    Most likely PR 62329. Running some tests to confirm.

  10. francoisl commented on Jun 4, 2025

    @francoisl
    Contributor

    Reverting #62329 on main reintroduces the issue, so it means that's the PR that fixed it. I'll request a CP and look for the PR that from the checklist that caused the issue in the first place later.

  11. melvin-bot commented on Jun 4, 2025

    @melvin-bot

    ⚠️ Looks like this issue was linked to a Deploy Blocker here

    If you are the assigned CME please investigate whether the linked PR caused a regression and leave a comment with the results.

    If a regression has occurred and you are the assigned CM follow the instructions here.

    If this regression could have been avoided please consider also proposing a recommendation to the PR checklist so that we can avoid it in the future.

  12. roryabraham commented on Jun 5, 2025

    @roryabraham
    Contributor

    Wasn't able to reproduce on staging

  13. roryabraham commented on Jun 5, 2025

    @roryabraham
    Contributor
  14. IuliiaHerets commented on Jun 5, 2025

    @IuliiaHerets

    @roryabraham Not repro on Mac 15.5 Desktop 15.5, build 9.1.59-7

    Recording.442.mp4
  15. francoisl commented on Jun 5, 2025

    @francoisl
    Contributor

    Nice, no one can repro anymore, let's demote. Thanks for the retest.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Labels

BugSomething is broken. Auto assigns a BugZero manager.EngineeringHourlyKSv2

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions