You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
[Due for payment 2025-09-19] [$250] mWeb - Chat - Chat doesn't auto-scroll when a payment is received with chat opened #65792
Version Number: 9.1.78-4 Reproducible in staging?: Y Reproducible in production?: Y If this was caught during regression testing, add the test name, ID and link from TestRail: N/A Issue reported by: Applause - Internal Team
Action Performed:
Precondition: Log in with two different accounts (User A,User B)
If we only want scrollToBottom with the same account, we will add the check const isFromCurrentUser = lastAction?.childLastActorAccountID ?? lastAction?.childOwnerAccountID ?? CONST.REPORT.OWNER_ACCOUNT_ID_FAKE === currentUserAccountID
If we only want to handle the IOU case, we can add a condition to the if clause.
What specific scenarios should we cover in automated tests to prevent reintroducing this issue in the future?
NA
What alternative solutions did you explore? (Optional)
NA
Reminder: Please use plain English, be brief and avoid jargon. Feel free to use images, charts or pseudo-code if necessary. Do not post large multi-line diffs or write walls of text. Do not create PRs unless you have been hired for this job.
changed the title [-]mWeb - Chat - Chat doesn't auto-scroll when a payment is received with chat opened[/-][+][$250] mWeb - Chat - Chat doesn't auto-scroll when a payment is received with chat opened[/+]on Jul 11, 2025
📣 @dmkt9 You have been assigned to this job!
Please apply to the Upwork job and leave a comment on the Github issue letting us know when we can expect a PR to be ready for review 🧑💻
Once you apply to this job, your Upwork ID will be stored and you will be automatically hired for future jobs!
Keep in mind: Code of Conduct | Contributing 📖
[Contributor] Classify the bug: Looks like this is a new requirement
Bug classification
Source of bug:
1a. Result of the original design (eg. a case wasn't considered)
1b. Mistake during implementation
1c. Backend bug
1z. Other:
Where bug was reported:
2a. Reported on production (eg. bug slipped through the normal regression and PR testing process on staging)
2b. Reported on staging (eg. found during regression or PR testing)
2d. Reported on a PR
2z. Other:
Who reported the bug:
3a. Expensify user
3b. Expensify employee
3c. Contributor
3d. QA
3z. Other:
[Contributor] The offending PR has been commented on, pointing out the bug it caused and why, so the author and reviewers can learn from the mistake.
Link to comment: Looks like this is a new requirement
[Contributor] If the regression was CRITICAL (e.g. interrupts a core flow) A discussion in #expensify-open-source has been started about whether any other steps should be taken (e.g. updating the PR review checklist) in order to catch this type of bug sooner.
Link to discussion:
[Contributor] If it was decided to create a regression test for the bug, please propose the regression test steps using the template below to ensure the same bug will not reach production again.
[BugZero Assignee] Create a GH issue for creating/updating the regression test once above steps have been agreed upon.
Link to issue:
Regression Test Proposal
Precondition: Log in with two different accounts (User A,User B)
Activity
melvin-bot commentedon Jul 9, 2025
Triggered auto assignment to @garrettmknight (
Bug), see https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/14418 for more details. Please add this bug to a GH project, as outlined in the SO.dmkt9 commentedon Jul 10, 2025
Proposal
Please re-state the problem that we are trying to solve in this issue.
User A verifies that the chat doesn't auto-scroll when a payment is received, and the payment preview isn't visible without manually scrolling down
What is the root cause of that problem?
Currently only implements the
scrollToBottommechanism when an action is removed but not added:App/src/pages/home/report/ReportActionsList.tsx
Lines 347 to 355 in 15c2eb6
What changes do you think we should make in order to solve the problem?
scrollToBottommechanism when detecting a new action added:App/src/pages/home/report/ReportActionsList.tsx
Lines 347 to 352 in 15c2eb6
scrollToBottomwith the same account, we will add the checkconst isFromCurrentUser = lastAction?.childLastActorAccountID ?? lastAction?.childOwnerAccountID ?? CONST.REPORT.OWNER_ACCOUNT_ID_FAKE === currentUserAccountIDWhat specific scenarios should we cover in automated tests to prevent reintroducing this issue in the future?
NA
What alternative solutions did you explore? (Optional)
NA
Reminder: Please use plain English, be brief and avoid jargon. Feel free to use images, charts or pseudo-code if necessary. Do not post large multi-line diffs or write walls of text. Do not create PRs unless you have been hired for this job.
[-]mWeb - Chat - Chat doesn't auto-scroll when a payment is received with chat opened[/-][+][$250] mWeb - Chat - Chat doesn't auto-scroll when a payment is received with chat opened[/+]melvin-bot commentedon Jul 11, 2025
Job added to Upwork: https://www.upwork.com/jobs/~021943737232871320803
melvin-bot commentedon Jul 11, 2025
Triggered auto assignment to Contributor-plus team member for initial proposal review - @c3024 (
External)melvin-bot commentedon Jul 15, 2025
@c3024 Whoops! This issue is 2 days overdue. Let's get this updated quick!
c3024 commentedon Jul 15, 2025
Will update today.
98 remaining items
melvin-bot commentedon Sep 22, 2025
📣 @dmkt9 You have been assigned to this job!
Please apply to the Upwork job and leave a comment on the Github issue letting us know when we can expect a PR to be ready for review 🧑💻
Once you apply to this job, your Upwork ID will be stored and you will be automatically hired for future jobs!
Keep in mind: Code of Conduct | Contributing 📖
garrettmknight commentedon Sep 22, 2025
@dmkt9 please apply!
dmkt9 commentedon Sep 23, 2025
@garrettmknight Thanks. I have just applied for the job.
garrettmknight commentedon Sep 23, 2025
Offer is out
garrettmknight commentedon Sep 23, 2025
@DylanDylann checklist please.
DylanDylann commentedon Sep 25, 2025
BugZero Checklist:
Bug classification
Source of bug:
Where bug was reported:
Who reported the bug:
[Contributor] The offending PR has been commented on, pointing out the bug it caused and why, so the author and reviewers can learn from the mistake.
Link to comment: Looks like this is a new requirement
[Contributor] If the regression was CRITICAL (e.g. interrupts a core flow) A discussion in #expensify-open-source has been started about whether any other steps should be taken (e.g. updating the PR review checklist) in order to catch this type of bug sooner.
Link to discussion:
[Contributor] If it was decided to create a regression test for the bug, please propose the regression test steps using the template below to ensure the same bug will not reach production again.
[BugZero Assignee] Create a GH issue for creating/updating the regression test once above steps have been agreed upon.
Link to issue:
Regression Test Proposal
Precondition: Log in with two different accounts (User A,User B)
Test:
Do we agree 👍 or 👎
garrettmknight commentedon Sep 29, 2025
Payment Summary
Contributor: @dmkt9 paid $250 via Upwork
Contributor+: @DylanDylann due $250 via NewDot
garrettmknight commentedon Nov 11, 2025
$250 approved for @DylanDylann