Repository navigation
[Due for payment 2025-12-10] [$125] Fix flaky tests/actions/ReportTest.ts #76263
Description
🚨 Failure Summary 🚨:
- 📋 Job Name: test / test (job 5)
- 🔧 Failure in Workflow: Process new code merged to main
- 🔗 Triggered by PR: PR Link
- 👤 PR Author: @kacper-mikolajczak
- 🤝 Merged by: @mountiny
- 🐛 Error Message:
failure: Process completed with exit code 1.
warning: Cache not found for keys: Linux-node-modules-b6c87a2e23a40d751e8799f429058e09c0b0a8ea95c039fa6b495fbc27c78cff
🛠️ A recent merge appears to have caused a failure in the job named test / test (job 5).
This issue has been automatically created and labeled with Workflow Failure for investigation.
👀 Please look into the following:
- Why the PR caused the job to fail?
- Address any underlying issues.
🐛 We appreciate your help in squashing this bug!
Upwork Automation - Do Not Edit
- Upwork Job URL: https://www.upwork.com/jobs/~021994461870167175195
- Upwork Job ID: 1994461870167175195
- Last Price Increase: 2025-11-28
- Automatic offers:
- linhvovan29546 | Contributor | 109655526
Activity
kacper-mikolajczak commentedon Nov 28, 2025
On it! 👀
kacper-mikolajczak commentedon Nov 28, 2025
Hmm looks like all the tests are passing on latest commit cfa8fde (history view). @mountiny let me know if this is still valid, thanks!
[-]Investigate workflow job failing on main: test / test (job 5)[/-][+]Fix flaky tests/actions/ReportTest.ts[/+][-]Fix flaky tests/actions/ReportTest.ts[/-][+][$250] Fix flaky tests/actions/ReportTest.ts[/+]melvin-bot commentedon Nov 28, 2025
Job added to Upwork: https://www.upwork.com/jobs/~021994461870167175195
mountiny commentedon Nov 28, 2025
Seems like it is flaky
16 remaining items
[-][$125] Fix flaky tests/actions/ReportTest.ts[/-][+][Due for payment 2025-12-10] [$125] Fix flaky tests/actions/ReportTest.ts[/+]melvin-bot commentedon Dec 3, 2025
Reviewinglabel has been removed, please complete the "BugZero Checklist".melvin-bot commentedon Dec 3, 2025
The solution for this issue has been 🚀 deployed to production 🚀 in version 9.2.70-0 and is now subject to a 7-day regression period 📆. Here is the list of pull requests that resolve this issue:
If no regressions arise, payment will be issued on 2025-12-10. 🎊
For reference, here are some details about the assignees on this issue:
melvin-bot commentedon Dec 3, 2025
@suneox / @linhvovan29546 @sonialiap The PR fixing this issue has been merged! The following checklist (instructions) will need to be completed before the issue can be closed. Please copy/paste the BugZero Checklist from here into a new comment on this GH and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]
sonialiap commentedon Dec 10, 2025
Payment summary:
@suneox $125 please request in NewDot. Please complete the checklist if applicable
@linhvovan29546 $125 paid in upwork ✔️
suneox commentedon Dec 10, 2025
BugZero Checklist:
[Contributor] The offending PR has been commented on, pointing out the bug it caused and why, so the author and reviewers can learn from the mistake.
Link to comment: https://github.com/Expensify/App/pull/67193/files#r2607273758
[Contributor] If the regression was CRITICAL (e.g. interrupts a core flow) A discussion in #expensify-open-source has been started about whether any other steps should be taken (e.g. updating the PR review checklist) in order to catch this type of bug sooner.
Link to discussion: N/A
[Contributor] If it was decided to create a regression test for the bug, please propose the regression test steps using the template below to ensure the same bug will not reach production again.
N/A: cause it isn't an impactful bug without QA
sonialiap commentedon Dec 11, 2025
Thanks Cong!
garrettmknight commentedon Dec 18, 2025
$125 approved for @suneox