Skip to content

[Payment due @marufsharifi] Set member work arrangement - #101876

Merged
Gonals merged 47 commits into
Expensify:mainfrom
fedirjh:fedy/set-employee-work-arrangement
Sep 30, 2026
Merged

Gonals merged 47 commits into
Expensify:mainfrom
fedirjh:fedy/set-employee-work-arrangement

Conversation

@fedirjh

@fedirjh fedirjh commented Sep 22, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Explanation of Change

Adds a per-member work arrangement setting (Office-based / No regular workspace) for homeAndOffice workspaces: PolicyEmployee.hasOfficeWorkArrangement type, setEmployeeWorkArrangement action with offline optimistic/success/failure handling plus per-member optimistic changelog entries, rendered changelog messages, a Work arrangement row on the member details page, and a new WorkArrangementPage radio selector.

Fixed Issues

$ https://github.com/Expensify/Expensify/issues/642612
PROPOSAL:

Tests

  1. On a homeAndOffice workspace, open Members → a member's detail page and verify the Work arrangement row reads the current value (defaults to Remote or mobile).
  2. Tap the row, select Office-based, and verify you're navigated back with the row updated, plus one changed 's work arrangement to office-based… entry in the #admins room thread.
  3. Reopen the selector and verify Office-based is pre-selected (per-member value beats the workspace default).
  4. On a fixedDistance (or unset) workspace, verify the row is absent;
  5. as a non-admin, verify direct navigation to .../members//work-arrangement is blocked.
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

Same as tests

QA Steps

Same as tests.

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If new assets were added or existing ones were modified, I verified that:
    • The assets are optimized and compressed (for SVG files, run npm run compress-svg)
    • The assets load correctly across all supported platforms.
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If the PR adds or modifies the UI:
    • I asked an AI agent to review the changes for accessibility issues and addressed its findings.
    • I tested with a screen reader (VoiceOver on macOS) and verified all new/changed elements are reachable with a logical focus order.
    • I verified all new/changed elements have meaningful accessible names and roles.
    • I verified state changes are announced (e.g. checked/unchecked, expanded/collapsed, selected).
  • I added unit tests for any new feature or bug fix in this PR to help automatically prevent regressions in this user flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Screenshot 2026-09-22 at 5 23 38 PM Screenshot 2026-09-22 at 5 23 52 PM Screenshot 2026-09-22 at 5 23 57 PM Screenshot 2026-09-22 at 5 24 08 PM
CleanShot.2026-09-22.at.17.24.27.mp4

@melvin-bot

melvin-bot Bot commented Sep 22, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Hey, I noticed you changed src/languages/en.ts in a PR from a fork. For security reasons, translations are not generated automatically for PRs from forks.

If you want to automatically generate translations for other locales, an Expensify employee will have to:

  1. Look at the code and make sure there are no malicious changes.
  2. Run the Generate static translations GitHub workflow. If you have write access and the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

Alternatively, if you are an external contributor, you can run the translation script locally with your own OpenAI API key. To learn more, try running:

npx bun ./scripts/generateTranslations.ts --help

Typically, you'd want to translate only what you changed by running npx bun ./scripts/generateTranslations.ts --compare-ref main

@fedirjh
fedirjh requested a review from Gonals September 22, 2026 15:54
@melvin-bot

melvin-bot Bot commented Sep 22, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

I could not review this diff, so I did not approve the workflow runs. An Expensify employee will review it and approve them manually.

@codecov

codecov Bot commented Sep 22, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ Changes either increased or maintained existing code coverage, great job!

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
src/CONST/index.ts 95.79% <ø> (ø)
src/ROUTES.ts 31.00% <100.00%> (+0.05%) ⬆️
src/SCREENS.ts 100.00% <ø> (ø)
src/libs/API/types.ts 100.00% <ø> (ø)
...gation/AppNavigator/ModalStackNavigators/index.tsx 7.78% <100.00%> (+0.09%) ⬆️
...gation/linkingConfig/RELATIONS/WORKSPACE_TO_RHP.ts 100.00% <ø> (ø)
src/libs/Navigation/linkingConfig/config.ts 62.50% <ø> (ø)
src/libs/PolicyUtils.ts 89.04% <100.00%> (+0.01%) ⬆️
src/libs/ReportActionsUtils.ts 82.50% <100.00%> (+0.08%) ⬆️
src/libs/WorkArrangementUtils.ts 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
... and 7 more
... and 11 files with indirect coverage changes

@melvin-bot

melvin-bot Bot commented Sep 24, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

I could not review this diff, so I did not approve the workflow runs. An Expensify employee will review it and approve them manually.

@fedirjh
fedirjh marked this pull request as ready for review September 24, 2026 08:33
@fedirjh
fedirjh requested a review from a team as a code owner September 24, 2026 08:34
@fedirjh

fedirjh commented Sep 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@marufsharifi Can you please prioritize the review on this? it should unblock the next PRs.

@marufsharifi

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@fedirjh, sure i will update here in a few hours. thanks.

@marufsharifi marufsharifi left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, Just a Typo

@melvin-bot melvin-bot Bot changed the title Set member work arrangement [Payment due @marufsharifi] Set member work arrangement Sep 30, 2026
@melvin-bot

melvin-bot Bot commented Sep 30, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🎯 @marufsharifi, thanks for reviewing and testing this PR! 🎉

A payment issue will be created for your review once this PR is deployed to production.
E/E issue linked to the PR - https://www.github.com/Expensify/Expensify/issues/642612.

If payment is not needed (e.g., regression PR review fix etc), react with 👎 to this comment to prevent the payment issue from being created.

@marufsharifi

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@fedirjh, could you please check the last feedback as well. thanks.

@Gonals

Gonals commented Sep 30, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified that the composer does not automatically focus or open the keyboard on mobile unless explicitly intended. This includes checking that returning the app from the background does not unexpectedly open the keyboard.
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: HybridApp
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: HybridApp
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If the PR adds or modifies the UI:
    • I asked an AI agent to review the changes for accessibility issues and addressed its findings.
    • I tested with a screen reader (VoiceOver on macOS) and verified all new/changed elements are reachable with a logical focus order.
    • I verified all new/changed elements have meaningful accessible names and roles.
    • I verified state changes are announced (e.g. checked/unchecked, expanded/collapsed, selected).
  • For any bug fix or new feature in this PR, I verified that sufficient unit tests are included to prevent regressions in this flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: HybridApp
Android: mWeb Chrome
iOS: HybridApp
iOS: mWeb Safari
MacOS: Chrome / Safari

@Gonals
Gonals merged commit 86d1cf7 into Expensify:main Sep 30, 2026
35 of 37 checks passed
@fedirjh
fedirjh deleted the fedy/set-employee-work-arrangement branch September 30, 2026 12:52
@OSBotify

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🚧 Gonals has triggered a test Expensify/App build. You can view the workflow run here.

@OSBotify

OSBotify commented Oct 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/Gonals in version: 9.5.0-0 🚀

platform result
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

@MelvinBot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No help site update is needed: the new Work arrangement row and selector are only shown when the COMMUTER_EXCLUSIONS_ARRANGEMENTS beta is enabled, so most users can't see this feature yet.

@kavimuru

kavimuru commented Oct 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@fedirjh can you help with "homeAndOffice workspace" ?

@fedirjh

fedirjh commented Oct 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

can you help with "homeAndOffice workspace" ?

@kavimuru workspace with commuter exclusion settings set as homeAndOffice :

Screenshot 2026-10-01 at 10 15 14 AM

@kavimuru

kavimuru commented Oct 1, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@fedirjh We "Remote or mobile" instead of "No regular workspace", is this expected?
image (4)

image (5)

@fedirjh

fedirjh commented Oct 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

We "Remote or mobile" instead of "No regular workspace", is this expected?

@kavimuru Yes expected. Updated the steps.

@melvin-bot

melvin-bot Bot commented Oct 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🤖 Payment issue created: #102816

@OSBotify

OSBotify commented Oct 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/Julesssss in version: 9.5.0-5 🚀

platform result
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 failure ❌

Bundle Size Analysis (Sentry):

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants