Skip to content

docs(redesign): the 5-3 note's two open questions were settled on 2026-10-12 - #244

Open
jaewooann wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
laf/record-background-browser-first-caller
Open

jaewooann wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
laf/record-background-browser-first-caller

Conversation

@jaewooann

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

What this changes

Two lines in docs/laf/redesign-2026-10.md §5. The 5-3 note's "아직 아닌 것" still read that
nobody uses a background browser yet and that its tab cap is the main browser's six. Both were
settled on 2026-10-12 and are recorded further down the same section: routines are the first
caller (#210), and the cap is two until the VM is measured (the owner's second-pass fix on #210).
The note now points at those two entries instead of reading as still open.

Also the trial asked for by 재우: whether bugbot run works on a pull request opened from
this account (jaewooann) rather than the owner's. CLAUDE.md says Bugbot reads only pull requests
the owner's account opened; this checks it. The result will be posted here.

Where it runs

Nowhere: documentation only.

  • New state that outlives a request? None.
  • New listener, port, or schedule? None.
  • Anything the deployment cannot honour? Nothing new drawn.

Boundary and audit

  • Every acting call still goes through the gateway. — no code changed.
  • New refusals and new failures each write a row. — none.
  • Nothing new is trusted from the client.
  • Nothing new lets an action past a person.
  • A Bot cannot write the rule that decides whether it gets asked about.
  • Nothing new records a value somebody typed.

Korean

  • No user-facing string.
  • None read through a variable.
  • The server sends facts; the surface owns the words.

The gate

  • bun run format:check passes; no code, no test and no floor changed.
  • No test is added: the change is two lines of a decision record.

Proof

The two entries the note now points at, in the same section: "루틴이 백그라운드 브라우저로 옮겨감:
2026-10-12" and "루틴 브라우저의 탭은 둘까지다" (agent-computer/src/browsers.ts,
BACKGROUND_TAB_LIMITS).

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

백그라운드 브라우저의 첫 호출자(루틴, 2026-10-12)와 그 탭 상한(VM을 잴 때까지 임시로 둘)은
아래 메모에서 정해졌는데, 5-3의 메모는 아직 "미정"과 "여섯"이라고 읽혔다.

Co-authored-by: LAF Agent <274876363+laf-agent@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@jaewooann

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

bugbot run

@cursor

cursor Bot commented Oct 14, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Skipping Bugbot: Unable to authenticate your request. Please make sure Bugbot is properly installed and configured for this repository.

@codesolarlght codesolarlght Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🔆 CodeSolar review ✅ Looks good

Documentation-only change to docs/laf/redesign-2026-10.md §5-3. Replaces the '아직 아닌 것' bullet's two open questions (who uses the background browser; tab cap) with a pointer to two entries claimed to have been settled on 2026-10-12: first caller is routines, and tab cap is two until VM is measured.

✅ No issues worth flagging.


solar-pro4 (openrouter) · 1 files · +2/-0 · 79.5s · CodeSolar

Comment /codesolar on this PR to re-run the review.

@jaewooann

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Bugbot from this account: not run. bugbot run from jaewooann on this pull request (also opened by jaewooann, not a draft) was answered in three seconds with: "Skipping Bugbot: Unable to authenticate your request. Please make sure Bugbot is properly installed and configured for this repository." No review followed. The owner's own first bugbot run on #211 was answered differently ("Bugbot is not enabled for your account") and ran once that was switched on, so this is the account, not the repository's setup.

What this does not tell apart: whether Bugbot looks at who opened the pull request or who asked. A bugbot run from the owner's account on this pull request would settle it.

🤖 Posted by Claude Code

This branch has not been deployed

No deployments
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant