Skip to content

InMemoryKache::getOrPut fails in high concurrency context #239

Open

Description

@vfsfitvnm

Hi 😸
I noticed I was getting NullPointerExceptions when using SHA256KeyHasher.
I could narrow it down to InMemoryKache - the following test fails:

    @Test
    fun concurrency() = runTest {
        val cache = InMemoryKache<String, String>(maxSize = 1)

        (0..100000).map(Int::toString).forEach {
            launch { cache.getOrPut(it) { it }!! }
        }
    }

Stack trace:

java.lang.NullPointerException
	at com.mayakapps.kache.InMemoryKacheTest$concurrency$1$2$1.invokeSuspend(InMemoryKacheTest.kt:36)
	at kotlin.coroutines.jvm.internal.BaseContinuationImpl.resumeWith(ContinuationImpl.kt:33)
	at kotlinx.coroutines.DispatchedTask.run(DispatchedTask.kt:104)
	at kotlinx.coroutines.test.TestDispatcher.processEvent$kotlinx_coroutines_test(TestDispatcher.kt:24)
	at kotlinx.coroutines.test.TestCoroutineScheduler.tryRunNextTaskUnless$kotlinx_coroutines_test(TestCoroutineScheduler.kt:99)
	at kotlinx.coroutines.test.TestBuildersKt__TestBuildersKt$runTest$2$1$workRunner$1.invokeSuspend(TestBuilders.kt:322)
	at kotlin.coroutines.jvm.internal.BaseContinuationImpl.resumeWith(ContinuationImpl.kt:33)
	at kotlinx.coroutines.DispatchedTask.run(DispatchedTask.kt:104)
	at kotlinx.coroutines.EventLoopImplBase.processNextEvent(EventLoop.common.kt:277)
	at kotlinx.coroutines.BlockingCoroutine.joinBlocking(Builders.kt:95)
	at kotlinx.coroutines.BuildersKt__BuildersKt.runBlocking(Builders.kt:69)
	at kotlinx.coroutines.BuildersKt.runBlocking(Unknown Source)
	at kotlinx.coroutines.BuildersKt__BuildersKt.runBlocking$default(Builders.kt:48)
	at kotlinx.coroutines.BuildersKt.runBlocking$default(Unknown Source)
	at kotlinx.coroutines.test.TestBuildersJvmKt.createTestResult(TestBuildersJvm.kt:10)
	at kotlinx.coroutines.test.TestBuildersKt__TestBuildersKt.runTest-8Mi8wO0(TestBuilders.kt:310)
	at kotlinx.coroutines.test.TestBuildersKt.runTest-8Mi8wO0(Unknown Source)
	at kotlinx.coroutines.test.TestBuildersKt__TestBuildersKt.runTest-8Mi8wO0(TestBuilders.kt:168)
	at kotlinx.coroutines.test.TestBuildersKt.runTest-8Mi8wO0(Unknown Source)
	at kotlinx.coroutines.test.TestBuildersKt__TestBuildersKt.runTest-8Mi8wO0$default(TestBuilders.kt:160)
	at kotlinx.coroutines.test.TestBuildersKt.runTest-8Mi8wO0$default(Unknown Source)
	at com.mayakapps.kache.InMemoryKacheTest.concurrency(InMemoryKacheTest.kt:32)

Activity

  1. paulrs commented on Jul 18, 2024

    @paulrs

    We are seeing similar NPEs in this code.

    Uncaught Kotlin exception: kotlin.NullPointerException
        at 0   AppEcc                              0x10587ad97        kfun:kotlin.Throwable#<init>(){} + 95 
        at 1   AppEcc                              0x105874167        kfun:kotlin.Exception#<init>(){} + 87 
        at 2   AppEcc                              0x105874387        kfun:kotlin.RuntimeException#<init>(){} + 87 
        at 3   AppEcc                              0x1058745a7        kfun:kotlin.NullPointerException#<init>(){} + 87 
        at 4   AppEcc                              0x1058af41f        ThrowNullPointerException + 131 
        at 5   AppEcc                              0x105d8f4d7        kfun:com.mayakapps.kache.SHA256KeyHasher.$transformCOROUTINE$0.invokeSuspend#internal + 783 
        at 6   AppEcc                              0x1059afd1f        kfun:kotlin.coroutines.native.internal.BaseContinuationImpl#invokeSuspend(kotlin.Result<kotlin.Any?>){}kotlin.Any?-trampoline + 67 
    

    SHA256KeyHasher has the following code:

        override suspend fun transform(oldKey: String): String = hashedCache.getOrPut(oldKey) {
            oldKey.encodeUtf8().sha256().hex().uppercase()
        }!! // Since our creation function never returns null, we can use not-null assertion

    Notice the comment at the end.

    Now look at the following:

        override suspend fun getOrPut(key: K, creationFunction: suspend (key: K) -> V?): V? {
            get(key)?.let { return it }
    
            creationMutex.withLock {
                if (creationMap[key] == null && map[key] == null) {
                    @Suppress("DeferredResultUnused")
                    internalPutAsync(key, creationFunction) // <!--- ASYNC
                }
            }
    
            return get(key) // <!-- DID ASYNC ABOVE FINISH?
        }

    I know nothing about coroutines in Kotlin, but I see an async call that I'm guessing is not guaranteed to finish before the return get call at the end of the method, resulting in a nasty race condition where sometimes you'll get a value and other times you will not. This seems extremely bad.

  2. djehrlich commented on Jul 19, 2024

    @djehrlich

    I was able to replicate the crash using the unit test provided above:

        @Test
        fun concurrency() = runTest {
            val cache = InMemoryKache<String, String>(maxSize = 1)
    
            (0..100000).map(Int::toString).forEach {
                launch { cache.getOrPut(it) { it }!! }
            }
        }

    I found that by replacing the second call to get(key) in the getOrPut(…) function with a new function I called unsafeGet(key: K): V, the problem goes away. This is my unsafeGet(…) implementation:

    private suspend fun unsafeGet(key: K): V = (getFromCreation(key) ?: getIfAvailable(key))!!

    Since unsafeGet(…) is a copy of get(…), but with evictExpired() removed (and a force unwrap added), this suggests to me that evictExpired() may be triggering a race condition. However, my Kotlin experience is limited, so my confidence in this analysis is not particularly high.

    As an aside, by calling get(…) twice, evictExpired() is being called twice. Is this really necessary in a single call to getOrPut(…)? Calling evictExpired() twice seems superfluous and possibly a performance issue.

  3. MSDarwish2000 commented on Sep 21, 2024

    @MSDarwish2000
    Member

    Thank you for reporting the issue and investigating it, and sorry for being late.

    I would like to further investigate and try to fix the issue in the next few days.

  4. jimirocks commented on Jun 9, 2025

    @jimirocks

    Any update on this after several months?

  5. added 2 commits that reference this issue on Jun 25, 2026
    90ea398
    474bdbf
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    bugSomething isn't working

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions