Skip to content

Add some additional instructions for those new to this repo#7

Closed
jordanhubbard wants to merge 5 commits into
NVIDIA:mainfrom
jordanhubbard:main
Closed

Add some additional instructions for those new to this repo#7
jordanhubbard wants to merge 5 commits into
NVIDIA:mainfrom
jordanhubbard:main

Conversation

@jordanhubbard

Copy link
Copy Markdown

My markdown skills are a bit :derp: but I think this will avoid some confusion for future users.

@vzhurba01

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Thanks for your contribution. At this time we're not accepting pull requests and ask that an issue is filed to describe a proposal. Check out CONTRIBUTING.md for further details.

With respect to the changes, the new Release of v11.5.0 modified some test instructions. Note that you can specify which test file you want to run:
python -m pytest examples/0_Simple/simpleCudaGraphs_test.py
as well as which subtest:
python -m pytest -k test_cuda_memcpy

Closing.

@vzhurba01 vzhurba01 closed this Oct 20, 2021
rparolin added a commit to rparolin/cuda-python that referenced this pull request Jun 10, 2026
…ad_store (NVIDIA#467)

Applies design decisions resolved in NVIDIA#2188:
- #1: rename public `Array` class to `CUDAArray` (PEP 8 CapWords; aligns with
  CuPy's `cupy.cuda.texture.CUDAarray`). `ArrayFormat` left unchanged (open detail).
- NVIDIA#6: rename the bool property `surface_load_store` -> `is_surface_load_store`
  to follow the repo's `is_<x>` convention. Constructor keyword `surface_load_store=`
  kept as-is (open detail). Private field `_surface_load_store` unchanged.

GL interop examples retained (decision NVIDIA#7 reversed) and updated to the new names.
Verified: cuda.core builds in the cu12 env and the renamed public API imports
(`CUDAArray`, `is_surface_load_store` present; old `Array`/`surface_load_store` gone).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants