Skip to content

Updates needed when building with CUDA 13 - #1219

Merged
rapids-bot[bot] merged 2 commits into
branch-25.10from
fea/add_support_for_cuda_13
Aug 7, 2025
Merged

Updates needed when building with CUDA 13#1219
rapids-bot[bot] merged 2 commits into
branch-25.10from
fea/add_support_for_cuda_13

Conversation

@robertmaynard

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

cuvs also requires NVIDIA/raft#2774 to be merged

@robertmaynard

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/merge

@rapids-bot
rapids-bot Bot merged commit 2cdb85d into branch-25.10 Aug 7, 2025
147 of 151 checks passed
@robertmaynard
robertmaynard deleted the fea/add_support_for_cuda_13 branch August 7, 2025 13:49

struct base_filter {
virtual ~base_filter() = default;
~base_filter() = default;

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Likely a silly question, but wouldn't this cause leaks or incorrect behaviour, if base_filter instances are deleted?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I didn't see any derived types that had local storage. If we have any derived types that do have storage they would still be okay as long as they are deleted as the derived type. ( So no holding a vector of base_filter pointers and calling delete on that ).

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Agreed. I couldn't find that sort of thing either.

Thank you.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

feature request New feature or request non-breaking Introduces a non-breaking change

Projects

Status: Done

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants