This repository now encompasses a specialized implementation for testing propositions from "The Oxford Handbook of Entertainment Theory" by Vorderer and Klimmt. Our pipeline, incorporating advanced scraping, metadata extraction, and feature analysis, integrates with a Large Language Model (LLM) to simulate user reactions to YouTube Shorts. This approach facilitates an in-depth exploration of media entertainment theories, particularly focusing on user control and affective responses.
- Topic-Based Scraping: 🌐 Refined to target videos aligning with theoretical concepts under study.
- In-Depth Metadata Extraction: 📝 Now includes viewer engagement metrics and additional relevant parameters.
- Feature Extraction: 🔍
- Words Per Minute (WPM) Analysis: Analyzing speech variation patterns over time.
- Emotion Extraction: Utilizing NLP techniques for nuanced emotional expression analysis.
- LLM-Powered Simulation and Analysis: 🧠 Replicating and analyzing studies, focusing on:
- Proposition 2.1 Analysis: Examining the relationship between control capacity, motivation, and affective reactions.
- Proposition 2.2 Exploration: Investigating how control factors influence reappraisal of affective responses and goal prioritization.
We conducted a case study focusing on Propositions 2.1 and 2.2 from Media Entertainment as Guilty Pleasure? The Appraisal of Media Use, Self-Control, and Entertainment (AMUSE) Model by Reinecke and Meier
- Proposition 2.1: "Control capacity and control motivation negatively predict the intensity of both positive and negative primary affective reactions to within-media events."
- Proposition 2.2: "Control capacity and motivation moderate the reappraisal of primary affective responses to within-media events, with low self-control favoring short-term mood management goals, and high self-control favoring higher-order goals."
- Data Collection: Gathered a diverse range of YouTube Shorts.
- Feature Analysis: Applied emotion and speech pattern analysis.
- LLM Simulation: Simulated user reactions based on control capacity and motivation levels.
- Comparative Analysis: Compared LLM-generated reactions with theoretical expectations.