Skip to content

Add Xquik OpenAPI parser coverage - #2

Open
kriptoburak wants to merge 2 commits into
UnitOneAI:mainfrom
kriptoburak:codex/xquik-openapi-parser-test
Open

Add Xquik OpenAPI parser coverage#2
kriptoburak wants to merge 2 commits into
UnitOneAI:mainfrom
kriptoburak:codex/xquik-openapi-parser-test

Conversation

@kriptoburak

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Summary:

  • Add an OpenAPI 3.1 parser regression case using the public Xquik search endpoint shape.
  • Cover API-key auth detection, server extraction, operation IDs, and query parameters.

Validation:

  • npx vitest run --root . src/generator/ApiParser.test.ts

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 71bf9b02f8

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread src/generator/ApiParser.test.ts
@kriptoburak

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

If this is useful and you merge it after checks pass, feel free to share the PR on X/Twitter and mention my handle, burakbayir. I can repost or retweet it to my 24k followers of developers and power users, which may help more relevant users discover this repo.

@kriptoburak

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Addressed the server artifact finding in 9bfe7ea. The server tsconfig now excludes test sources. Under Node 20, tests, server build, typecheck, and lint pass, and dist/server/generator/ApiParser.test.js is absent.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant