Skip to content

Need to figure plan for browser support matrix for launch and going forward #84

Closed

Description

@lmclister
No description provided.

Activity

  1. betravis commented on Sep 10, 2014

    @betravis
    Contributor

    I would recommend including some static support tables at the bottom of each relevant page. We could still link to a qunit test suite if people would like to test their own browser, however, test suite and browserscope maintenance tend to degrade pretty quickly over my opinion. Updating a static table is that much simpler, and provides users at-a-glance information rather than requiring them to jump to another page.

    Something along the lines of caniuse.com or webplatform docs seems appropriate.

    An example of webplatform docs for shape-outside.
    shape-outside-compat-table

  2. bemjb commented on Sep 11, 2014

    @bemjb
    Contributor

    Fixing this might be related to fixing issue #65, since they really should be using the same data source.

  3. modified the milestones: , Initial Announce of webplatform.adobe.com on Sep 11, 2014
  4. modified the milestone: MAX Release on Sep 23, 2014
  5. 3 remaining items

  6. modified the milestone: MAX Release on Sep 23, 2014
  7. betravis commented on Oct 2, 2014

    @betravis
    Contributor

    Did two quick mockups, one with images, one without.
    Figured we should iterate while it's easy to do.

    With Images

    browser-support

    Without Images

    browser-support-text

  8. rhauck commented on Oct 2, 2014

    @rhauck
    Collaborator

    @betravis I love the images, so that'd be what I'd vote for. However, the Y / N seem a too weak. maybe some sort of color or icon to to make them visually easier?

  9. lmclister commented on Oct 2, 2014

    @lmclister
    MemberAuthor

    What @rhauck said ^

  10. betravis commented on Oct 2, 2014

    @betravis
    Contributor

    A couple more variations, with colors. I think the boxes need some method of demarcation.
    @rhauck, @lmclister Thoughts? I think I like the last one best, but it makes the images slightly smaller.

    With border line

    browser-support-colors

    With alternating background on heading row

    browser-support-background

    With alternating background and transparent border

    browser-support-white-border

  11. rhauck commented on Oct 2, 2014

    @rhauck
    Collaborator

    @betravis I like the alternating bg & transparent border (the third one). The red/green/yellow colors look a little rich though. can they be toned down a bit? Or maybe the don't need to be as big?
    /cc @lmclister

  12. betravis commented on Oct 2, 2014

    @betravis
    Contributor

    Sass has these lovely color manipulation functions, so there's no reason we can't do both :)
    Bringing down the saturation on the colors and decreasing the vertical padding a bit on the items.

    I think I'll invert the opera logo (red circle, white 'o') for the final design.

    Toned down

    desaturate-depad

  13. rhauck commented on Oct 2, 2014

    @rhauck
    Collaborator

    @betravis Looks much better. Ship it! /cc @lmclister

  14. rhauck commented on Oct 3, 2014

    @rhauck
    Collaborator

    fixed in #149

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

    Milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions