Repository navigation
Elvis ?: [enhacement] #28
Description
Activity
It doesn't parse, so I'm guessing it cannot be done. But how about a lady gaga operator
?$:?Reacted by Sergei Egorovis that possible? At first I thought it was a joke, but then I saw it as
String firstName = user ? $ : getFirstName()And I assume somehow $ is a magical variable that doesn't mess with the type system.
Mi ignorance about the whole source file -> class file process is almost perfect, so I don't know what can be done in each stage.
If it is possible, it is a nice workaround, and while somehow strange, it is way better than
String firstName = user == null ? null : user.getFirstName()Yes, it should be possible if the $ variable is defined in the background
(the way lombok defines 'val'). However, your last example is the null-safe
dereference operator, which is different from elvis, and is usually?..
Anyway, I don't know much about the limits of compiler plugins either.On Mon, Jul 13, 2015, 8:44 AM Pablo Grisafi notifications@github.com
wrote:is that possible? At first I thought it was a joke, but then I saw it as
String firstName = user ? $ : getFirstName()
And I assume somehow $ is a magical variable that doesn't mess with the
type system.Mi ignorance about the whole source file -> class file process is almost
perfect, so I don't know what can be done in each stage.If it is possible, it is a nice workaround, and while somehow strange, it
is way better thanString firstName = user == null ? null : user.getFirstName()
—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#28 (comment).
Thanks again for your extraordinary work.
You said that adding new operator is difficult because of no extension points at that stage. What about the elvis ?: operator, better known as null coalescing operator ? you know, instead of
String firstName = user == null ? null : user.getFirstName()
i'd like to write
String firstName = user?:getFirstName()
I don't know if that counts as a new operator, since both chars already have a meaning