Repository navigation
Testing status of the Providers released 2021.05.01 #15623
Description
Activity
- addedkind:metaHigh-level information important to the communityHigh-level information important to the community
on May 1, 2021 The voting for the RC packages should close by Wednesday 5th of May mid-day CEST. It would be great if majority of the changes/fixes is verified by then :).
Voting thread in the devlist: https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rb3fb597796a5b1bf83f97879e6783049dc8f2496b594bc5f3641eee3%40%3Cdev.airflow.apache.org%3E
I had another PR on the postgres provider get merged just now, any chance it can be included in the RC?
Unless this is really serious, I think I'd prefer to leave it for a follow-up ad-hoc release (1.0.3)? The mechanics of releasing providers works best if we release them in batches. From the bug description, I do not think the bug was critical (correct me if I am wrong?) so 1.0.2 will still be mostly working OK, so we can easily make a (very fast) 1.0.3 release right after?
Reacted by zhzhang and Elad KalifLooking forward to some testing :). Doing some testing today myself.
tested the changes added by #14642 involving docker provider
Reacted by Jarek PotiukReacted by Jarek PotiukReacted by Jarek PotiukTested snowflake. Looks good.
Reacted by Jarek PotiukReacted by Jarek PotiukReacted by Jarek PotiukTested postgres changes against a Redshift cluster, looks good to me!
Reacted by Jarek PotiukReacted by Jarek PotiukTested the
cncf.kuberneteschanges (except #15388) and had no issues.Reacted by Jarek PotiukReacted by Jarek Potiuk- SFTP and FTP Providers working well All Green 😁 [image: image.png] [image: image.png] ในวันที่ พ. 5 พ.ค. 2021 เวลา 05:34 Jed Cunningham ***@***.***> เขียนว่า:…Tested the cncf.kubernetes changes (except #15388 <#15388>) and had no issues. — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#15623 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AH6ME4RCHM5ZQYYWVNEMXOTTMBY7PANCNFSM436GRR5A> .Reacted by Jarek PotiukReacted by Jarek Potiuk
Cool! last chance to test some of the others :). Would be great to get Amzon, Spark, Elasticsearch, Micorosft ones also at least smoke-tested :)
Thanks to all who tested their changes. I am closing this one - and proceeding with the release. The changes on the remaining providers look good from the inspection.
We are releasing new providers for Airflow with latest fixes - RCs released on 2021.05.01.
This is a kind request for authors of the changes. It would be great if you could verify if the providers do what they are supposed to do :).
https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-amazon/1.4.0rc1/
https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-apache-spark/1.0.3rc1/
https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-cncf-kubernetes/1.2.0rc1/
https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-docker/1.2.0rc1/
https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-elasticsearch/1.0.4rc1/
https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-ftp/1.1.0rc1/
https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-google/3.0.0rc1/
https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-jira/1.0.2rc1/
https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-microsoft-azure/2.0.0rc1/
https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-microsoft-mssql/1.1.0rc1/
https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-microsoft-winrm/1.2.0rc1/
https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-postgres/1.0.2rc1/
https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-sftp/1.2.0rc1/
https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-snowflake/1.3.0rc1/
No changes - just dependencies:
Please comment below if/when you test the RC with your changes.