You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
Stale DAG Deactivation in DAG Processor is extremely hard on the database in environments with many DAGs #21397
When we upgraded from Airflow 2.1.2 to 2.2.2 we noticed that our MySQL instance was running near 100% CPU utilization while it was closer to 20% on Airflow 2.1.2.
After a long investigation, we found that the queries introduced in #17121 are extremely hard on the database, especially when there are multiple schedulers, a high value of parsing_processes and a large number of DAGs.
Our setup is as follows:
4x Schedulers
~20k rows in the dag table
~10k DAG files
parsing_processes=32
So each time a DAG is parsed, a query like this will be run:
UPDATE dag
SET is_active=0WHEREdag.fileloc='/path/to_my/dag.py'ANDdag.is_active=1ANDdag.dag_id NOT IN ('my-dag-1', 'my-dag-2');
And because dag isn't indexed on fileloc, the query ends up doing a full-table-scan (or nearly a full-table-scan), and this is repeated for every single file which is processed.
When I added these queries, I tested the change in a local breeze environment with a relatively small number of DAGs and thus did not notice the performance implications.
At our scale / configuration, we have approximately 128 of these poorly-performant queries running in parallel, each scanning approximately 20,000 rows. Understandably this was really hard on the database which ended up drastically impacting the performance of other queries.
We were able to reduce the impact by lowering the parsing_processes, cleaning up old entries in the dag table and increasing the min_file_processing_interval, but none of these mitigations really address the root of the problem.
We are currently working on a fix which moves this cleanup to the DAG Processor manager and eliminates un-indexed queries and should be able to submit a preliminary pull request for review in the next few days.
What you expected to happen
Removing DAGs which no longer exist in files should not put so much strain on the database.
How to reproduce
Use a high number of parsing_processes and/or scheduler replicas in an Airflow 2.2+ Environment with many DAGs.
Now that one fix has been proposed (#21399) and I have validated it in our Airflow deployments, what do you think about the proposed implementation? Any preferences between:
Adding an indexed fileloc_hash to the DAG table and refactoring the existing code to use this index.
bulk-deactivating deactivating files from the processor manager (as proposed above)
I am happy to help implement either change but would really like some careful review and discussion of the proposed methods.
Activity
ashb commentedon Feb 7, 2022
It sounds like this would be fixed by adding an index on dag model table, right?
SamWheating commentedon Feb 7, 2022
Yes, but we can't add an index on the
fileloccolumn because the column size is too large (I think its aVARCHAR(2000)or something)ashb commentedon Feb 7, 2022
Oh thanks Mysql.
Ah yes, that's why we've already got the fileloc_hash column on DagCode and SerializedDag tables.
SamWheating commentedon Feb 7, 2022
In this case would it make sense to add a
fileloc_hashcolumn to theDAGtable? I can also push my proposed alternate implementation shortly.ashb commentedon Feb 7, 2022
It might, but if you have another solution that feels less hacky (as I don't like the "split" column all that much) lets take a look
potiuk commentedon Feb 7, 2022
A lot.
SamWheating commentedon Feb 23, 2022
Now that one fix has been proposed (#21399) and I have validated it in our Airflow deployments, what do you think about the proposed implementation? Any preferences between:
fileloc_hashto the DAG table and refactoring the existing code to use this index.I am happy to help implement either change but would really like some careful review and discussion of the proposed methods.
SamWheating commentedon Mar 24, 2022
Closed in #21399