Skip to content

Status of testing Providers that were prepared on March 03, 2023 #29901

Description

@eladkal

Body

I have a kind request for all the contributors to the latest provider packages release.
Could you please help us to test the RC versions of the providers?

Let us know in the comment, whether the issue is addressed.

Those are providers that require testing as there were some substantial changes introduced:

Provider amazon: 7.3.0rc1

Provider apache.flink: 1.0.1rc1

Provider apache.livy: 3.3.0rc1

Provider atlassian.jira: 2.0.1rc1

Provider cncf.kubernetes: 5.2.2rc1

Provider common.sql: 1.3.4rc1

Provider dbt.cloud: 3.1.0rc1

Provider github: 2.2.1rc1

Provider google: 8.11.0rc1

Provider hashicorp: 3.3.0rc1

Provider mysql: 4.0.2rc1

Provider sftp: 4.2.4rc1

Provider ssh: 3.5.0rc1

Provider telegram: 4.0.0rc1

Provider yandex: 3.3.0rc1

The guidelines on how to test providers can be found in Verify providers by contributors

All users involved in the PRs:
@kristopherkane @sunank200 @LMnet @phanikumv @jose-lpa @pdebelak @ferruzzi @vincbeck @r-richmond @vandonr-amz @eladkal @wiktorn @maxnathaniel @pgagnon @hussein-awala @bkossakowska @Taragolis
@pankajastro @fritz-astronomer @romibuzi @josh-fell @lwyszomi @potiuk @s0neq @Aakcht @FloMom @IKholopov @yehoshuadimarsky

Committer

  • I acknowledge that I am a maintainer/committer of the Apache Airflow project.

Activity

  1. added
    kind:metaHigh-level information important to the community
    on Mar 3, 2023
  2. eladkal commented on Mar 3, 2023

    @eladkal
    ContributorAuthor

    Contributors are also encouraged to cast non-binding vote in the mailing list thread.

  3. s0neq commented on Mar 3, 2023

    @s0neq
    Contributor

    Provider yandex: 3.3.0rc1 has been tested. all is fine 👌

  4. vandonr-amz commented on Mar 3, 2023

    @vandonr-amz
    Contributor

    all good for me as it's covered by a system test that's green

  5. fritz-astronomer commented on Mar 3, 2023

    @fritz-astronomer
    Contributor

    Snowflake change has unit test coverage 👍

  6. hussein-awala commented on Mar 3, 2023

    @hussein-awala
    Member

    Provider google: 8.11.0rc1 : I tested #29394 and it works as expected.
    Provider sftp: 4.2.4rc1: Same for #29794.
    Provider hashicorp: 3.3.0rc1: I have tested #29734 and it works, but currently we should use the same variables, config and connections paths for all the mount points because there is a bug in the Vault secrets backend, I wonder if we can add #29908 to this release or we add it to the next one.

  7. eladkal commented on Mar 3, 2023

    @eladkal
    ContributorAuthor

    @hussein-awala I will cancel RC1 for hashicorp provider and will cut RC2 after the current vote

  8. Aakcht commented on Mar 4, 2023

    @Aakcht
    Contributor

    Tested #29347 for SSH provider 3.5.0rc1 - works as expected. Waiting for full release!

  9. Taragolis commented on Mar 4, 2023

    @Taragolis
    Contributor
  10. potiuk commented on Mar 4, 2023

    @potiuk
    Member
    • Checked flink -> it has the right >= 5.1.0 requirement on cncf.kubernetes 👍
    • Checked google -> the constants from auth library are properly inlined 👍

    Looks good.

  11. pdebelak commented on Mar 4, 2023

    @pdebelak
    Contributor

    I checked apache-airflow-providers-amazon and the change in #29708 is working as expected.

  12. maxnathaniel commented on Mar 4, 2023

    @maxnathaniel
    Contributor

    Provider telegram: 4.0.0rc1 works as expected 👍

  13. pankajastro commented on Mar 6, 2023

    @pankajastro
    Member

    #29657 #29348 and #29364 Looks good

  14. romibuzi commented on Mar 6, 2023

    @romibuzi
    Contributor

    #29659 working as expected

  15. raphaelauv commented on Mar 6, 2023

    @raphaelauv
    Contributor

    for the kubernetes the name of the feature is incorrect

    KubernetesPodOperator._render_nested_template_fields improved by changing the conditionals for a map (#29760): @jose-lpa

    ->

    KubernetesPodOperator._render_nested_template_fields improved by changing the conditionals (#29760): @jose-lpa

    ( there is no map )

  16. eladkal commented on Mar 6, 2023

    @eladkal
    ContributorAuthor

    for the kubernetes the name of the feature is incorrect

    KubernetesPodOperator._render_nested_template_fields improved by changing the conditionals for a map (#29760): @jose-lpa

    ->

    KubernetesPodOperator._render_nested_template_fields improved by changing the conditionals (#29760): @jose-lpa

    ( there is no map )

    The release mechanism currently does not allow us to change the commit messages. Probably something we need to improve on in the future.
    Since this is only issue with the commit title and not with the actual functionality I see no reason why we can't continue with release of this package.

  17. josh-fell commented on Mar 6, 2023

    @josh-fell
    Contributor

    #29741, #29699, and #29549 look good.
    Thanks for organizing @eladkal!

  18. pgagnon commented on Mar 6, 2023

    @pgagnon
    Contributor

    #29623 working as expected.

  19. IKholopov commented on Mar 6, 2023

    @IKholopov
    Contributor

    #29680 is effectively a noop (for now) and it is working as expected :)

  20. kristopherkane commented on Mar 6, 2023

    @kristopherkane
    Contributor

    #29136 Has been tested with real Google Cloud resources successfully.

  21. eladkal commented on Mar 6, 2023

    @eladkal
    ContributorAuthor

    Thank you everyone.
    Providers are released
    I invite everyone to help improve providers for the next release, a list of open issues can be found here.

  22. LMnet commented on Mar 6, 2023

    @LMnet
    Contributor

    #29434 has a unit test and also I use the same code locally in a while.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    kind:metaHigh-level information important to the communitytesting statusStatus of testing releases

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions