Skip to content

Status of testing of Apache Airflow 2.5.3rc2 #30337

Closed

Description

@pierrejeambrun

We have a kind request for all the contributors to the latest Apache Airflow RC 2.5.3rc2.

Could you please help us to test the RC versions of Airflow?

Please let us know in the comment if the issue is addressed in the latest RC.

Thanks to all who contributed to the release (probably not a complete list!):
@meujin @josh-fell @vemikhaylov @ashb @tirkarthi @farhan0syakir @auvipy @antoniocorralsierra @junho85 @SamWheating @PannagaMayya @mik-laj @IAL32 @eladkal @ephraimbuddy @aaronsatae @potiuk @yuqian90 @frankbreetz @milczar @badrisrinivas9 @jakubno @michaelmicheal @boushphong @hussein-awala @jcobb-healx @tanvn

Committer

  • I acknowledge that I am a maintainer/committer of the Apache Airflow project.

Activity

  1. raphaelauv commented on Mar 27, 2023

    @raphaelauv
    Contributor

    the graph view zoom on the first task , it's super weird

    Screenshot from 2023-03-28 00-07-17

    if I unzoom it look better

    Screenshot from 2023-03-28 00-09-18

  2. antoniocorralsierra commented on Mar 28, 2023

    @antoniocorralsierra
    Contributor

    DagProcess running as standalone process is working fine, the restart have disappeared. Congrats!!

  3. pierrejeambrun commented on Mar 28, 2023

    @pierrejeambrun
    MemberAuthor

    @raphaelauv I think it comes from #29971 which remove the 1.5 max zoomScale cap. (I would say that this is the indented behavior, I agree, it's really big, I'm not a big fan), but the fact that some nodes can be missing from the first focus is not great.

    @potiuk @ephraimbuddy @bbovenzi, Should we fix that and go for rc2 ? (I think yes)

  4. potiuk commented on Mar 28, 2023

    @potiuk
    Member

    @raphaelauv I think it comes from #29971 which remove the 1.5 max zoomScale cap. (I would say that this is the indented behavior, I agree, it's really big, I'm not a big fan), but the fact that some nodes can be missing from the first focus is not great.

    @potiuk @ephraimbuddy @bbovenzi, Should we fix that and go for rc2 ? (I think yes)

    I think it is more of an easthetic thing / UX than technical issue. The question is (I have not looked at it yet) - is it something that will happen with every graph every time or only with some almost-empty-non-connected-and-really-non-realistic graphs like this one above? If the former - yes, we should fix it IMHO, if the latter - I think we do not have to fix it.

  5. hussein-awala commented on Mar 28, 2023

    @hussein-awala
    Member

    I tested:

    and they both work as expected.

    But I agree with @raphaelauv about the graph default zoom level, it's weird and annoying.

    The question is (I have not looked at it yet) - is it something that will happen with every graph every time or only with some almost-empty-non-connected-and-really-non-realistic graphs like this one above?

    @potiuk it's the former, I have this zoom level on all the graphs for all the dag and dag runs. IMO we should fix it and go for rc2.

  6. potiuk commented on Mar 28, 2023

    @potiuk
    Member

    @potiuk it's the former, I have this zoom level on all the graphs for all the dag and dag runs. IMO we should fix it and go for rc2

    Then yes.

  7. ephraimbuddy commented on Mar 29, 2023

    @ephraimbuddy
    Contributor

    @potiuk it's the former, I have this zoom level on all the graphs for all the dag and dag runs. IMO we should fix it and go for rc2

    Then yes.

    Agree too

  8. bbovenzi commented on Mar 29, 2023

    @bbovenzi
    Contributor

    Fix: #30355

  9. pierrejeambrun commented on Mar 29, 2023

    @pierrejeambrun
    MemberAuthor

    Due to the graph zoom issue in rc1, rc2 has been made. I think we can safely assume that what was tested for rc1 is still working in rc2. Feel free to do more testing. The issue has been updated to target 2.5.3rc2

  10. changed the title [-]Status of testing of Apache Airflow 2.5.3rc1[/-] [+]Status of testing of Apache Airflow 2.5.3rc2[/+] on Mar 29, 2023
  11. potiuk commented on Mar 30, 2023

    @potiuk
    Member
    • which is actually a fix to my fix - neither on the list of issues here nor in release notes. The change is cherry-picked and technically it's a fix to a fix, so no big deal. Just wonder how it was lost from both release notes and issue status here.
  12. josh-fell commented on Mar 31, 2023

    @josh-fell
    Contributor

    #30131 Looks good.

    Thanks for organizing @pierrejeambrun!

  13. pierrejeambrun commented on Apr 1, 2023

    @pierrejeambrun
    MemberAuthor

    Thanks to everyone that helped testing 2.5.3rc1 and 2.5.3rc2. 🙏

    Closing as 2.5.3 has been released based on 2.5.3rc2 🎉

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    kind:metaHigh-level information important to the communitytesting statusStatus of testing releases

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions