Support multiple_outputs in @task.bash

[dheerajturaga]

BashOperator already unrolls a dict return value into one XCom per key —
multiple_outputs is a BaseOperator parameter and the Task SDK runner honours it
regardless of which operator produced the value. Pairing it with output_processor
works on BashOperator today:

BashOperator(
    task_id="emit",
    bash_command="""echo '{"rows": 42, "uri": "s3://bucket/out"}'""",
    multiple_outputs=True,
    output_processor=json.loads,
)
# pushes: rows=42, uri="s3://bucket/out", return_value={"rows": 42, "uri": ...}

The @task.bash decorator, however, warned that the option was unsupported and
silently forced it off, so Dag authors could not name individual outputs from a Bash
task even though the operator it wraps supported it. This drops the warning and lets
the value through, which also makes @task.bash consistent with the other decorators
in the provider (@task.virtualenv, @task.short_circuit, …), all of which pass
multiple_outputs through.

Docs gained a "Multiple XCom outputs" section — the existing "Output processor"
section never mentioned multiple_outputs, which made the capability easy to miss.
Both example Dags gained a producer/consumer task pair so the documented snippets come
from code that CI parses.

The docs are deliberately explicit about the constraints, since only the last line of
the merged stdout/stderr stream is captured: a trailing blank echo or a subcommand
writing to stderr last will overwrite the dict, the JSON must be single-line, and
every emitted line reaches the task log.

---

Was generative AI tooling used to co-author this PR?

• Yes — Claude Code (Opus 5)

Generated-by: Claude Code (Opus 5) following the guidelines

[dheerajturaga]

@Miretpl , I have responded to your concerns. I have 2 more follow-up PRs once this merges.

1. To add support for xcom's even when the task fails (which is not possible today)
2. To support task state storage for bashoperator.

I will add more context to the docs with those PRs as needed

[Miretpl]

Feel free to mark me for the review of followup.