Repository navigation
Bug: Drill to Detail / Drill by Not Working Across Charts from Jinja-Based Datasets #35263
Description
Bug description
I'm working with three separate datasets, each built using Jinja templating to support dynamic filtering. These datasets are used to power three different charts in a dashboard. All charts share common filter fields (e.g., start_date, Zone, Circle, etc.), and I’ve configured native filters to apply across all charts.
Each dataset uses Jinja to apply filters like this:
SQL query is something like this in all 3 datasets.
WHERE 1=1
{% if filter_values('Zone') %}
AND "Zone" IN {{ filter_values('Zone') | where_in }}
{% endif %}
The charts display correct data when filters are applied. However, when I use Drill to Detail or Drill by on any chart, the resulting detail view shows zero records, even though the chart clearly shows data for the selected value.
Expected Behavior
Drill to Detail should return the filtered rows from the dataset that match the clicked chart element (e.g., Circle = C1, type_of_node = A).
Actual Behavior
Drill to Detail and Drill by return no rows, even though the chart shows non-zero values. This happens consistently across all three charts.
Notes
-
All datasets use Jinja templating for dynamic filters.
-
All charts are built from separate datasets, but they share common column names and filter logic.
-
Native filters are scoped correctly to all charts.
-
The issue seems to be with how Superset applies drill filters to Jinja-based queries across multiple datasets.
Screenshots/recordings
No response
Superset version
4.1.3
Python version
3.9
Node version
16
Browser
Chrome
Additional context
Checklist
- I have searched Superset docs and Slack and didn't find a solution to my problem.
- I have searched the GitHub issue tracker and didn't find a similar bug report.
- I have checked Superset's logs for errors and if I found a relevant Python stacktrace, I included it here as text in the "additional context" section.
Activity
dosubot commentedon Sep 24, 2025
Hi @ShivamYadav0! I'm Dosu and I’m helping the superset team.
This is a known architectural limitation in Superset 4.1.3: when you use Drill to Detail or Drill by, the drill query only includes chart-level and drill-triggered filters, but does not merge the full dashboard/native filter context. As a result, Jinja-templated datasets that rely on
filter_values()for all filters may receive incomplete filter values during drill actions, leading to zero-row results—even when the parent chart shows data for the selected value. This matches your experience and is not specific to your configuration—it's a gap in how drill queries are constructed versus main chart queries (source).Recent fixes (after 4.1.3) have addressed some related issues, such as ensuring that drill filters use the original column names instead of verbose labels, which can resolve cases where Drill to Detail returns all or no rows due to filter mismatches (source). However, the core issue—drill queries not merging dashboard/native filters for Jinja-based datasets—remains in 4.1.3.
Recommended workarounds are to avoid relying on Jinja templating for dynamic filtering in chart queries. Instead, use virtual datasets, SQL
CASE WHENlogic, or custom SQL expressions for dynamic behavior (source). If you must use Jinja, ensure your queries have sensible defaults when filters are missing, but be aware this won't fully resolve the drill limitation.Upgrading to a newer Superset version may help with some filter propagation issues, but the architectural gap with Jinja and drill actions is still present as of the latest releases.
To reply, just mention @dosu.
Share context across your team and agents. Try Dosu.
ShivamYadav0 commentedon Sep 24, 2025
@dosu are there any similar PR or issues?
dosubot commentedon Sep 24, 2025
Yes, there are several highly relevant issues and PRs in the Superset repository that match your scenario:
The core architectural limitation—drill queries not merging dashboard/native filter context for Jinja-based datasets—remains as of the latest releases. You can track the above issue and PRs for updates or further discussion.
To reply, just mention @dosu.
Share context across your team and agents. Try Dosu.
sadpandajoe commentedon Sep 24, 2025
@ShivamYadav0 can you try on 5.0.0 or 6.0.0rc2 to see if you can repro these same issues? 4.1.X probably won't be supported soon so we're not actively fixing issues on that branch.
rusackas commentedon Sep 25, 2025
Yep, let's check on 5/6/
masterand see if it got fixed anywhere along the way.Hai6123 commentedon Nov 10, 2025
@rusackas I am using 5.0.0 version but it still have the issues, it is a bit different since I use Jinja in calculated columns for dynamic dimension
test(jinja): pin filter_values() drill-to-detail native-filter fallba…