[FIX] Hot fix for Windows CI - #6434
Merged
Merged
Conversation
ZihengJiang
approved these changes
Sep 9, 2020
Contributor
|
Out of curiosity, why this wasn't caught in the original PR CI? |
kevinthesun
approved these changes
Sep 9, 2020
Member
Author
|
not sure, it should have been caught. I am going to kill some of the runs in the ci to prioritize this one. |
junrushao
approved these changes
Sep 9, 2020
6 tasks
comaniac
approved these changes
Sep 9, 2020
tqchen
approved these changes
Sep 9, 2020
kevinthesun
pushed a commit
to kevinthesun/tvm
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 17, 2020
kevinthesun
pushed a commit
to kevinthesun/tvm
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 18, 2020
trevor-m
pushed a commit
to neo-ai/tvm
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 18, 2020
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
7 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
As title
Caused by #6297, actually @comaniac pointed out this line but it somehow was not addressed