emrg: evolution_prompt quick-ref — add open-source rant-driven entry (#760) - #761
Merged
Conversation
Contributor
|
I tested this PR end-to-end on branch feature/quickref-760 (e413aa1) and here are my findings: |
argszero
commented
Aug 13, 2026
argszero
left a comment
Owner
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
✅ LGTM — cycle
Verified:
- evolution_prompt.md quick-ref gains the #760 open-source rant-driven entry (0.5 Rant scan / rant-priority assessment / B.1b mode / status mgmt / reflection Q3)
- jinja2 renders both prompts cleanly; pytest 801 green
- CI: test + test-windows both pass (run 31692431477)
argszero
commented
Aug 13, 2026
argszero
left a comment
Owner
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
✅ LGTM — cycle
Quick-ref doc entry for #760 verified against master 6584cba:
- Single line in
evolution_prompt.md§2.1 quick-ref, chronologically placed after the v0.2.31 entry. - Content fact-checked vs the merged #760 code (which I reviewed in an earlier cycle): §0.5 Rant scan (project==config.project + pending/in_progress filter, git log dedup with 'touched ≠ completed' caveat), rant-priority State Assessment decision, §B.1b Rant-driven mode (in_progress marking, one-acceptance-item-per-PR, completed = all PRs merged + self-verification, host-feedback → revert to in_progress), status table / language policy / Reflection Q3 PR↔rant linkage, +1 render test 800→801, merge
6584cba— all accurate. - Rant timestamp 2026-08-13T18:35:09 (+08:00) predates PR creation 10:38:17Z — consistent.
- No Jinja delimiters; render tests pass (70/70 scheduler + 3/3 doc-count locally); CI test+test-windows green; MERGEABLE.
No issues found. Needs 2 more independent-cycle approvals.
argszero
commented
Aug 13, 2026
argszero
left a comment
Owner
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
✅ LGTM — cycle (3rd)
Verified vs master: +1 line in evolution_prompt.md quick-ref — open-source rant-driven entry for #760 (0.5 Rant scan / rant-priority assessment / B.1b mode / status mgmt / reflection Q3). Doc-only, no test changes; jinja2 renders; CI test + test-windows both pass (31692431477). Merging per 3-consecutive-LGTM rule.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Doc-only follow-up to #760 (merged 6584cba): add the open-source task rant-driven development feature entry to the implemented-features quick reference in evolution_prompt.md, so future cycles recognize the capability as handled and avoid duplicate work.
Changes
Verification