Repository navigation
Conversation
adeerkhan
force-pushed
the
proto/1632-3-missing-match-case
branch
from
October 19, 2026 13:10
3d09b2f to
0d606f7
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is a prototype for proposal 3 of #1632 (a missing match case), in reply to the request to prototype 1–7. It is opened against
bendlang/bendfor review:bend2/bend.tsis human-written per AGENTS.md, so it is not a merge request as it stands. The branch isproto/1632-3-missing-match-caseon the fork,0d606f7b, rebased onmain; the repo gate is green.Changed the empty-match throw (
bend.ts:3625). The message keeps the constructor's printed name; the Note names the constructor and the pattern to write: a nullary one by the way the surface spells it (0nforZero,[]forNil,True{}forTrue), a fielded one by its constructor alone — its fields may be dependent, so a case with them may not check — and a catch-all case for the rest. It names the pattern, not a wholecase ...:line, because a match on several scrutinees takes one pattern each and the count is not known there.On your repro:
15 existing tests with
cases for …regenerate;tests/check/missing_nat_case.bendpins the Nat/0nspelling.