fix(provider): widen interleaved reasoning fields (#39556) - #8
Conversation
Co-authored-by: Aiden Cline <rekram1-node@users.noreply.github.com>
|
@opencode-agent[bot] is attempting to deploy a commit to the adevloper152's projects Team on Vercel. A member of the Team first needs to authorize it. |
|
This PR doesn't fully meet our contributing guidelines and PR template. What needs to be fixed:
Please edit this PR description to address the above within 2 hours, or it will be automatically closed. If you believe this was flagged incorrectly, please let a maintainer know. |
1 similar comment
|
This PR doesn't fully meet our contributing guidelines and PR template. What needs to be fixed:
Please edit this PR description to address the above within 2 hours, or it will be automatically closed. If you believe this was flagged incorrectly, please let a maintainer know. |
|
Thanks for your contribution! This PR doesn't have a linked issue. All PRs must reference an existing issue. Please:
See CONTRIBUTING.md for details. |
|
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: ASSERTIVE Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughInterleaved capability schemas now accept booleans, named fields, and arbitrary strings. Provider normalization converts string values into structured fields, with tests covering configured models and models.dev input. OpenAPI definitions reflect the expanded representations. ChangesInterleaved capability support
Estimated code review effort: 3 (Moderate) | ~20 minutes Suggested reviewers: Poem
✨ Finishing Touches 💡 1🛠️ Fix failing CI checks 💡
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Warning There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool's configuration or disable the tool if it's a critical failure. 🔧 ESLint
ESLint install failed. For unrecoverable errors, disable the tool in CodeRabbit configuration. Comment |
|
The following comment was made by an LLM, it may be inaccurate: |
Issue for this PR
Closes #
Type of change
What does this PR do?
Please provide a description of the issue, the changes you made to fix it, and why they work. It is expected that you understand why your changes work and if you do not understand why at least say as much so a maintainer knows how much to value the PR.
If you paste a large clearly AI generated description here your PR may be IGNORED or CLOSED!
How did you verify your code works?
Screenshots / recordings
If this is a UI change, please include a screenshot or recording.
Checklist
If you do not follow this template your PR will be automatically rejected.
Need help on this PR? Tag
@codesmith-botwith what you need. Autofix is enabled.Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
reasoning_content,reasoning_text, and custom field names.Bug Fixes