docs: clarify session and auth middleware order - #661
Open
oxura wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The panic correctly indicates that the session extension is missing, but the old suggestion to “add SessionMiddleware” is misleading when both middlewares are already present in the wrong builder order.
The diagnostic now explains both cases: add
SessionMiddleware, and when authentication is enabled, register it afterAuthMiddleware. TheRootHandlerBuilder::middlewareAPI docs,AuthMiddlewareexample, and project introduction now explain the wrapping rule: later registrations run earlier for each request. The panic regression pins the actionable wording.Verification:
cargo +1.94.0 fmt --all -- --checkunknown-lintsallowed because Clippy 1.94 predates an upstream lint)Closes #276.