Skip to content

Workflow architecture diagrams - #3142

Merged
hhunter-ms merged 3 commits into
dapr:v1.10from
cgillum:v1.10-architecture
Feb 10, 2023
Merged

hhunter-ms merged 3 commits into
dapr:v1.10from
cgillum:v1.10-architecture

Conversation

@cgillum

@cgillum cgillum commented Feb 6, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Thank you for helping make the Dapr documentation better!

Please follow this checklist before submitting:

  • Commits are signed with Developer Certificate of Origin (DCO - learn more)
  • Read the contribution guide
  • Commands include options for Linux, MacOS, and Windows within codetabs
  • New file and folder names are globally unique
  • Page references use shortcodes instead of markdown or URL links
  • Images use HTML style and have alternative text
  • Places where multiple code/command options are given have codetabs

In addition, please fill out the following to help reviewers understand this pull request:

Description

The workflow-architecture document was missing some diagrams. This PR adds in three diagrams to help complete the article.

I also made a few tiny whitespace fixes, mainly to keep VS Code happy and remove warning squiggles.

Currently, only one of the three diagrams are "Daprized". Let me know if you'd like me to Daprize the other two, or if that can be done separately.

Issue reference

Part of #3134.

Signed-off-by: Chris Gillum <cgillum@microsoft.com>
@cgillum
cgillum requested review from a team as code owners February 6, 2023 18:20
@hhunter-ms hhunter-ms added this to the 1.10 milestone Feb 6, 2023
Co-authored-by: Hannah Hunter <94493363+hhunter-ms@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Gillum <cgillum@gmail.com>

@hhunter-ms hhunter-ms left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

Signed-off-by: Hannah Hunter <hannahhunter@microsoft.com>
@hhunter-ms
hhunter-ms merged commit bda594c into dapr:v1.10 Feb 10, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants