Repository navigation
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Tom Bamford <5719506+ap0phi5@users.noreply.github.com>
|
Anyone able to allow this to run the CI tests? |
|
@nabokihms If it is within your purview, could you let the tests run on this please? |
|
Bump. Is there anything more I can do to help this PR be considered? |
|
Looks like CI is stuck. In any case, I wonder if it would make sense to make this configurable. @cardoe is telling me that it requires reapproval which may be a problem for users. We could leave the default the old value for a while and after a grace period change it to the new one. |
|
Actually, I've been thinking about something like Kubernetes' feature flag for a while now. This would be a prime candidate. |
|
It would be really great to get this merged! |
|
It's been quite a long time now since the issue was raised and no action taken. Personally I think it's very little effort for an Entra SysAdmin to approve a permissions change request for apps that are reducing their permissions from @sagikazarmark would you be happy to approve the change without configuration, on the basis that it's a security improvement that most Entra SysAdmins would welcome? |
Overview
This is a small change to reduce the default permission scope for a Microsoft connector from the overly-permissive
directory.read.alldown togroupMember.read.all.What this PR does / why we need it
Closes #3989