Skip to content

Revise definition of switch expr being exhaustive #1654

Description

@Nigel-Ecma

Quote is last in thread, previous included.


Let's change "shall be" to "may be" which also gives us wiggle room around nullable types and exhaustiveness.

Originally posted by @jskeet in #873 (comment)

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

No labels
No labels

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions