Skip to content

EventSource use of EventAttribute triggers dynamic methods in attribute usage #90405

Description

@stephentoub

For an empty Main method, and enabling DOTNET_JitDisasmSummary, we see all of these:

   8: JIT compiled (dynamicClass):InvokeStub_EventAttribute.set_Level(System.Object,System.Object,ulong) [FullOpts, IL size=25, code size=27]
   9: JIT compiled (dynamicClass):InvokeStub_EventAttribute.set_Message(System.Object,System.Object,ulong) [FullOpts, IL size=25, code size=28]
  10: JIT compiled (dynamicClass):InvokeStub_EventAttribute.set_Task(System.Object,System.Object,ulong) [FullOpts, IL size=25, code size=27]
  11: JIT compiled (dynamicClass):InvokeStub_EventAttribute.set_Opcode(System.Object,System.Object,ulong) [FullOpts, IL size=25, code size=27]
  12: JIT compiled (dynamicClass):InvokeStub_EventAttribute.set_Version(System.Object,System.Object,ulong) [FullOpts, IL size=25, code size=28]
  13: JIT compiled (dynamicClass):InvokeStub_EventAttribute.set_Keywords(System.Object,System.Object,ulong) [FullOpts, IL size=25, code size=28]
  14: JIT compiled (dynamicClass):InvokeStub_EventAttribute.set_Level(System.Object,System.Span`1[System.Object]) [FullOpts, IL size=36, code size=40]
  15: JIT compiled (dynamicClass):InvokeStub_EventAttribute.set_Message(System.Object,System.Span`1[System.Object]) [FullOpts, IL size=26, code size=37]
  16: JIT compiled (dynamicClass):InvokeStub_EventAttribute.set_Task(System.Object,System.Span`1[System.Object]) [FullOpts, IL size=36, code size=40]
  17: JIT compiled (dynamicClass):InvokeStub_EventAttribute.set_Opcode(System.Object,System.Span`1[System.Object]) [FullOpts, IL size=36, code size=40]
  18: JIT compiled (dynamicClass):InvokeStub_EventAttribute.set_Version(System.Object,System.Span`1[System.Object]) [FullOpts, IL size=36, code size=41]
  19: JIT compiled (dynamicClass):InvokeStub_EventAttribute.set_Keywords(System.Object,System.Span`1[System.Object]) [FullOpts, IL size=36, code size=41]

EventSource is looking for [Event] on a type using GetCustomAttributes, which uses MethodInfo.Invoke to populate the attribute, and since there's more than one attribute, the setters all get invoked twice, triggering the MethodInfo.Invoke to use reflection emit and dynamically generate a method to handle each setter.

On my machine, this is costing ~10% of time-to-Main. When I disable the dynamic method approach, startup improves by ~5ms.

Activity

  1. ghost added
    area-CodeGen-coreclrCLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMI
    on Aug 11, 2023
  2. ghost added
    untriagedNew issue has not been triaged by the area owner
    on Aug 11, 2023
  3. added and removed
    area-CodeGen-coreclrCLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMI
    on Aug 11, 2023
  4. changed the title [-]EventListener use of EventAttribute triggers dynamic methods in attribute usage[/-] [+]EventSource use of EventAttribute triggers dynamic methods in attribute usage[/+] on Aug 11, 2023
  5. added this to the 8.0.0 milestone on Aug 11, 2023
  6. added and removed
    untriagedNew issue has not been triaged by the area owner
    on Aug 11, 2023
  7. steveharter commented on Aug 11, 2023

    @steveharter
    Contributor

    One approach to addressing some of this is to implement #75357 which would share previously generated IL if the signature is the same and the method is not virtual.

    Otherwise, there are other options to consider such as detecting the startup phase in the runtime, and having reflection respect that so it doesn't generate the invoke stubs.

  8. self-assigned this
    on Aug 14, 2023
  9. ericstj commented on Aug 14, 2023

    @ericstj
    Member

    @stephentoub does the logging here happen because we're enabling DOTNET_JitDisasmSummary or is it happening all the time? In other words - can we try and avoid the logging codepath during startup?

  10. stephentoub commented on Aug 14, 2023

    @stephentoub
    MemberAuthor

    does the logging here happen because we're enabling DOTNET_JitDisasmSummary

    It's not related to DOTNET_JitDisasmSummary; the JIT handles that directly, not managed code. EventSource is unrelated to that.

    or is it happening all the time?

    Invariably on Windows there's something somewhere on the box that's enabled an ETW session, which then causes every .NET app to trip over this, with NativeRuntimeEventSource being created on the startup path.

  11. steveharter commented on Aug 14, 2023

    @steveharter
    Contributor

    Moving to 9.0 however I'll investigate a solution now and we can always backport. The regression occurred in v7 (not v8).

    Invariably on Windows there's something somewhere on the box that's enabled an ETW session, which then causes every .NET app to trip over this, with NativeRuntimeEventSource being created on the startup path.

    Another approach is to determine if the ETW logging during startup is necessary.

  12. 1 remaining item

  13. added this to the 9.0.0 milestone on Aug 14, 2023
  14. steveharter commented on Sep 8, 2023

    @steveharter
    Contributor

    On my machine, this is costing ~10% of time-to-Main

    @stephentoub how was this measured? I tried launching corerun against simple console app and didn't see any improvments when only using interpreted invoke. Typical perf result like this:

    Method Mean Error StdDev Median Min Max Allocated
    AFTER 5.290 ms 0.1116 ms 0.1240 ms 5.271 ms 5.100 ms 5.571 ms 565 B
    BEFORE 5.306 ms 0.1625 ms 0.1806 ms 5.309 ms 5.031 ms 5.628 ms 565 B
  15. steveharter commented on Sep 8, 2023

    @steveharter
    Contributor

    With Jit results showing fewer items:
    BEFORE

       1: JIT compiled System.Guid:FormatGuidVector128Utf8(System.Guid,ubyte) [Tier0, IL size=322, code size=584]
       2: JIT compiled System.HexConverter:AsciiToHexVector128(System.Runtime.Intrinsics.Vector128`1[ubyte],System.Runtime.Intrinsics.Vector128`1[ubyte]) [Tier0, IL size=78, code size=359]
       3: JIT compiled System.Runtime.Intrinsics.Vector128:ShuffleUnsafe(System.Runtime.Intrinsics.Vector128`1[ubyte],System.Runtime.Intrinsics.Vector128`1[ubyte]) [Tier0, IL size=41, code size=50]
       4: JIT compiled (dynamicClass):InvokeStub_EventAttribute.set_Level(System.Object,System.Object,ulong) [FullOpts, IL size=25, code size=27]
       5: JIT compiled (dynamicClass):InvokeStub_EventAttribute.set_Message(System.Object,System.Object,ulong) [FullOpts, IL size=25, code size=28]
       6: JIT compiled (dynamicClass):InvokeStub_EventAttribute.set_Task(System.Object,System.Object,ulong) [FullOpts, IL size=25, code size=27]
       7: JIT compiled (dynamicClass):InvokeStub_EventAttribute.set_Opcode(System.Object,System.Object,ulong) [FullOpts, IL size=25, code size=27]
       8: JIT compiled (dynamicClass):InvokeStub_EventAttribute.set_Version(System.Object,System.Object,ulong) [FullOpts, IL size=25, code size=28]
       9: JIT compiled (dynamicClass):InvokeStub_EventAttribute.set_Keywords(System.Object,System.Object,ulong) [FullOpts, IL size=25, code size=28]
      10: JIT compiled (dynamicClass):InvokeStub_EventAttribute.set_Level(System.Object,System.Span`1[System.Object]) [FullOpts, IL size=36, code size=40]
      11: JIT compiled (dynamicClass):InvokeStub_EventAttribute.set_Message(System.Object,System.Span`1[System.Object]) [FullOpts, IL size=26, code size=37]
      12: JIT compiled (dynamicClass):InvokeStub_EventAttribute.set_Task(System.Object,System.Span`1[System.Object]) [FullOpts, IL size=36, code size=40]
      13: JIT compiled (dynamicClass):InvokeStub_EventAttribute.set_Opcode(System.Object,System.Span`1[System.Object]) [FullOpts, IL size=36, code size=40]
      14: JIT compiled (dynamicClass):InvokeStub_EventAttribute.set_Version(System.Object,System.Span`1[System.Object]) [FullOpts, IL size=36, code size=41]
      15: JIT compiled (dynamicClass):InvokeStub_EventAttribute.set_Keywords(System.Object,System.Span`1[System.Object]) [FullOpts, IL size=36, code size=41]
      16: JIT compiled StartupApp.Program:Main(System.String[]) [Tier0, IL size=3, code size=15]
    

    AFTER

       1: JIT compiled System.Guid:FormatGuidVector128Utf8(System.Guid,ubyte) [Tier0, IL size=322, code size=584]
       2: JIT compiled System.HexConverter:AsciiToHexVector128(System.Runtime.Intrinsics.Vector128`1[ubyte],System.Runtime.Intrinsics.Vector128`1[ubyte]) [Tier0, IL size=78, code size=359]
       3: JIT compiled System.Runtime.Intrinsics.Vector128:ShuffleUnsafe(System.Runtime.Intrinsics.Vector128`1[ubyte],System.Runtime.Intrinsics.Vector128`1[ubyte]) [Tier0, IL size=41, code size=50]
       4: JIT compiled StartupApp.Program:Main(System.String[]) [Tier0, IL size=3, code size=15]
    
  16. steveharter commented on Sep 8, 2023

    @steveharter
    Contributor

    Linking related issue #85791

  17. stephentoub commented on Sep 8, 2023

    @stephentoub
    MemberAuthor

    Typical perf result like this:

    What are you measuring that's only taking 5ms? That's not coreclr startup.

    @stephentoub how was this measured?

    IIRC, I built once with main and once with the codegen code path commented out, and then used Measure-Command to time many empty console app invocations.

  18. modified the milestones: 9.0.0, 10.0.0 on Jul 25, 2024
  19. steveharter commented on Jul 25, 2024

    @steveharter
    Contributor

    Possible design that is extensible:

    • Generate stubs for every reflection-invoked method done during startup by the runtime as well as other common consumers such as a "hello world" console app and ASP.Net. This may be extensible by other via new attribute that is detected by a source generator.
    • During startup, call these stubs during invoke likely using GetFunctionPointer() to avoid the invoke path. The code to call all of the stubs would be called from a method with essentially a hash lookup, "switch" and\or "if".
  20. removed their assignment
    on Jul 25, 2024
  21. self-assigned this
    on Sep 27, 2024
  22. added
    in-prThere is an active PR which will close this issue when it is merged
    on Jan 29, 2025
  23. modified the milestones: 10.0.0, Future on Jul 26, 2025
  24. removed
    in-prThere is an active PR which will close this issue when it is merged
    on Aug 1, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions