Skip to content

Get rid of no longer needed component level requirements - #562

Merged
NicolasFussberger merged 2 commits into
eclipse-score:mainfrom
etas-contrib:feature/cleanup_requirements
Sep 11, 2026
Merged

NicolasFussberger merged 2 commits into
eclipse-score:mainfrom
etas-contrib:feature/cleanup_requirements

Conversation

@TimoSteuerwaldETAS

@TimoSteuerwaldETAS TimoSteuerwaldETAS commented Aug 28, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Details see #559
@aschemmel-tech and @ramceb could you please have a look?

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Aug 28, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

License Check Results

🚀 The license check job ran with the Bazel command:

bazel run --lockfile_mode=error //:license-check

Status: ⚠️ Needs Review

Click to expand output
[License Check Output]
Extracting Bazel installation...
Starting local Bazel server (8.7.0) and connecting to it...
INFO: Invocation ID: 7ef78878-1eb4-4ae6-b442-dd6a20f7ee71
Computing main repo mapping: 
Computing main repo mapping: 
Loading: 
Loading: 0 packages loaded
Loading: 0 packages loaded
Loading: 0 packages loaded
Loading: 0 packages loaded
    currently loading: 
Loading: 0 packages loaded
    currently loading: 
Loading: 0 packages loaded
    currently loading: 
Loading: 0 packages loaded
    currently loading: 
Loading: 0 packages loaded
    currently loading: 
Loading: 1 packages loaded
Analyzing: target //:license-check (1 packages loaded, 0 targets configured)
Analyzing: target //:license-check (1 packages loaded, 0 targets configured)

Analyzing: target //:license-check (54 packages loaded, 10 targets configured)

Analyzing: target //:license-check (139 packages loaded, 627 targets configured)

Analyzing: target //:license-check (155 packages loaded, 3499 targets configured)

Analyzing: target //:license-check (157 packages loaded, 6276 targets configured)

Analyzing: target //:license-check (168 packages loaded, 9417 targets configured)

Analyzing: target //:license-check (168 packages loaded, 9417 targets configured)

Analyzing: target //:license-check (169 packages loaded, 9541 targets configured)

INFO: Analyzed target //:license-check (173 packages loaded, 11555 targets configured).
[3 / 14] checking cached actions
INFO: Found 1 target...
Target //:license.check.license_check up-to-date:
  bazel-bin/license.check.license_check
  bazel-bin/license.check.license_check.jar
INFO: Elapsed time: 22.981s, Critical Path: 0.30s
INFO: 16 processes: 4 disk cache hit, 12 internal.
INFO: Build completed successfully, 16 total actions
INFO: Running command line: bazel-bin/license.check.license_check ./formatted.txt <args omitted>
usage: org.eclipse.dash.licenses.cli.Main [-batch <int>] [-cd <url>]
       [-confidence <int>] [-ef <url>] [-excludeSources <sources>] [-help] [-lic
       <url>] [-project <shortname>] [-repo <url>] [-review] [-summary <file>]
       [-timeout <seconds>] [-token <token>]

@NicolasFussberger

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

LGTM. These changes were agreed in the weekly lifecycle call.
To be clarified with @aschemmel-tech if requirements can just be removed or shall bet set to rejected status.

This only describes a use case of comp_req__launch_man__process_launch_args.
Clarified with Markus Bechter.
This describes again a use case of comp_req__launch_man__process_launch_args.

A process waiting for a debugger connection is started via gdbserver and the proper command line arguments.
Clarified with Markus Bechter.
@TimoSteuerwaldETAS
TimoSteuerwaldETAS force-pushed the feature/cleanup_requirements branch from 4dcd676 to c7a8aac Compare September 11, 2026 11:49
@NicolasFussberger
NicolasFussberger merged commit e957858 into eclipse-score:main Sep 11, 2026
12 of 14 checks passed
@github-project-automation github-project-automation Bot moved this from Backlog to Done in LCM - Lifecycle & Health FT Sep 11, 2026

This branch had an error being deployed

1 failed deployment
workflow-approval — c7a8aac6 Deployed Sep 11, 2026 by TimoSteuerwaldETAS via Build and test unit-tests-x86_64-qnx / approval #778
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Archived in project

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants