Skip to content

Improvement: Requirements Engineering general handling of requirement types #1018

Closed

Description

@PandaeDo

Important

Make sure to link this issue with the PR for your improvement.

Requirements could have the types (Functional / Interface / Process / Legal / Non-Functional. According to the general traceability concept they were linked to the architecture. That makes no sense for legal and non-functional requirements. This should be described. And also how we want to proceed with the other types. The metamodel / checks might be adapted.

Activity

  1. added this to the milestone on Jun 3, 2025
  2. changed the issue type fromtoon Jun 5, 2025
  3. aschemmel-tech commented on Oct 1, 2025

    @aschemmel-tech
    Contributor
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Labels

No labels
No labels

Type

Projects

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions